Taipei First Girls’ High School literature teacher Alice Ou’s (區桂芝) criticism of the move to de-emphasize classical Chinese in the 2019 curriculum guidelines opened the door for heated discourse on education policy and culture.
Ou’s position as an educator at one of Taiwan’s best high schools lends credence to her relatively reactionary argument that the cut in the number of classical Chinese texts was “a crime deserving more than 10,000 deaths.”
Classical content still averages about 35 to 45 percent of high-school Chinese literature textbooks, as opposed to 45 to 65 percent under the previous curriculum.
The continued sanctification of some classical Chinese texts by Sinocentric academics makes replacing them difficult.
While there is merit in studying the classics, the heavy focus on them means that students are denied the opportunity to delve deeper into contemporary Taiwanese literature.
Discussions of education reform cannot be separated from the local political context and the long history of Sinocentric colonization under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the post-war period.
Furthermore, advanced classical Chinese is often comprehensible to only the most erudite few.
The promotion of classical Chinese is often rooted in the desire to maintain an elitist hierarchy rather than for its inherent utility or beauty.
New Culture Movement reformer Hu Shih (胡適), a literary academic, once said: “A dead language can never produce a living literature.”
Hu’s promotion of written vernacular Chinese to replace classical Chinese paved the way for a vibrant blossoming of creative and diverse Chinese literati, in conjunction with an expanded readership in the 20th century — a turning point in the history of literature.
An obsession with classics at the expense of new creative endeavors is not particular to an Eastern context. The famed Library of Alexandria, widely known to house one of the most comprehensive collections of ancient texts, eventually saw a decline in reputation during the Roman Empire.
The majority of the academics at the library focused extensively on editing and producing commentary on classical works of Hellenistic poetry, rather than creating new original works.
The term “Alexandrian” began to take on a negative connotation of banality and pedantry.
Literary scholarship dies when all the writing produced is entirely self-referential and esoteric.
Ou also makes a convoluted moral argument, marked with inflammatory exaggerations, that traditional values will be lost if the classics are not studied. These statements bear some similarity to the New Life Movement, in which the KMT attempted to restore traditional moral values and even make Confucianism a state cult.
The value of a holistic humanities education is not in the maintenance of traditional values, but rather in providing young people with the necessary tools to create meaning and engage in contemporary cultural circles.
Neither culture nor language are static monoliths. The obsession with an unchanging “dead language” eventually leads to a dead culture lost in the ever-flowing currents of time.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS