On Wednesday last week, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said that if elected president, he would assure Taiwan, the US and China that he would not support Taiwanese independence, nor would he accept China’s unification with Taiwan by force (武力統一). He would continue to maintain a middle course in the “Taiwan-US-China equilateral triangle,” which he believes is the only feasible foreign policy Taiwan can pursue.
The international relations theory of the so-called “equilateral triangle” says that it is only by keeping an equal distance between the world’s two greatest powers without choosing a side that a smaller power such as Taiwan can gain benefits from relations with the two great powers. The theory, based on Singapore as a model, proposes that Taiwan has a chance to play a leading role by serving as a bridge or even a mediator between the US and China.
International triangular politics is like this: A, B and C. With A as the strongest country, it would likely exert pressure on the less strong country B and the least strong country C to get what it wants. Studying the behavior of states suggests that in response, the less strong country B and the least strong country C would be likely to form an alliance to balance against the stronger power A. However, if A joins forces with C to fight against B, this is usually because B is on the rise and is developing a strategic posture that might threaten countries A and C, so to protect their interests they would likely join forces to negate the threat. When the A-C relationship improves, country B would likely attempt to weaken the alliance by currying favor with A to put pressure on country C.
Applying this to the situation in the Taiwan Strait, A is the US, B is China and C is of course Taiwan. From a Taiwanese perspective, if Taiwan wants to advance its national interest, it should convince the US that Taiwan would be a cooperative partner and strive to benefit from its partnership with the US. Once China tries to improve its relations with the US, Taiwan should either convince the US that it cannot be replaced, or convince the US that being on the same side as Taiwan better serves the US interest — such as their shared values, Taiwan’s geostrategic position and its crucial place in the technology supply chain. In either case, the best solution for Taiwan is always to stand on the same side as the US. The only question that remains is how close Taiwan should get with the US.
There are two problems with Ko’s theory. First, he does not understand the weakness of Taiwan’s international status and sovereignty. Second, Taiwan is the target of China’s unification attempts, and is at the center of a geopolitical conflict, which means that it is difficult for Taiwan to play a role similar to Singapore’s and gain advantages from close relations with both the US and China. If Singapore were in the geographical position of Taiwan, it would find itself in the same geopolitical dilemma.
Whether in geography or politics, three entities in proximity to one another must be equal in size and strength to be equidistant. Ko’s statement reveals that he does not understand Taiwan’s weak international status and sovereignty. His inclusion of “unification” as an option in the disguise of the term “non-forceful unification” is an attempt to draw the “enemy state” closer to Taiwan, and to send the signal that he and the TPP are for sale on the issue.
A saying in political science goes: Sitting on the fence is a good strategy when the fence is stable enough. This is exactly the basics of politics that Ko will never be able to grasp.
Kirk Lim is a civil servant.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS