Vice Premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) was accused of having an “illicit affair” a few months ago, after a video showing a man, who resembled Cheng, entering a hotel room with a woman was circulated online. In response, Cheng has said multiple times that the man in the video was not him, and he has asked his lawyer to file a defamation lawsuit to prove his innocence.
The Criminal Investigation Bureau, which was supposed to determine whether the video was generated by artificial intelligence (AI), said that the result was “inconclusive.”
The assessment was conducted using US and Netherlands-developed tools like Deepware and Sensity, with the former spotting no signs of deepfakes due to the video’s poor resolution, while the latter assigned it a 65 percent possibility of being a “deepfake” video. As the two programs did not show consistent results, the bureau could only declare the case “inconclusive.”
It has been reported that the two programs with equipment are priced at NT$20 million (US$637,471), and that it only takes half an hour to get results, which should mark it as the latest technology in the field of deepfakes. What is surprising is that even with the state-of-the-art technology, the police still have no way of obtaining conclusive results. This is remarkable, because not only did the investigation fail to prove Cheng’s innocence, it also assessed the video as having a 60 percent possibility of having been made with deepfake technology. What is even more perturbing is that if the video was faked, this case shows that the police do not have the technology to accurately detect deepfake content. This could be worrying if the technology falls into the wrong hands.
With the presidential election on Jan. 13 entering its final stages, the three presidential tickets are in a tight race, polls show.
If before the election someone spreads content that could damage the presidential candidates’ images and influence voters’ decisions, that could easily become a turning point.
Similar tricks have been tried in elections before. Two decades ago, someone leaked a fake audio tape to accuse then-Kaohsiung mayor Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) of having an affair during the Kaohsiung mayoral election, resulting in Wu losing to now Representative to Japan Frank Hsieh (謝長廷).
Compared with fake audio, deepfake videos bring a larger and more visual impact. Considering that we are in the digital age where videos could go viral in an instant, there could be no guarantee that such a trick would not take place the day before the election.
The Central Election Commission, the Ministry of Digital Affairs, the National Communications Commission, the National Police Agency and other agencies, as well as the government and opposition parties and campaign teams, should collaborate to take precautions by formulating crisis management and response strategies so that the public does not panic and campaigns do not fall into disarray if such a thing happens. Such an event would not only put Taiwan’s democracy to shame, it would also sow the seeds of even greater discord.
Weber Lai is a professor in National Taiwan University of Arts’ department of radio and television.
Translated by Rita Wang
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Many local news media last week reported that COVID-19 is back, citing doctors’ observations and the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics. The CDC said that cases would peak this month and urged people to take preventive measures. Although COVID-19 has never been eliminated, it has become more manageable, and restrictions were dropped, enabling people to return to their normal way of life due to decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In Taiwan, mandatory reporting of confirmed cases and home isolation ended in March last year, while the mask mandate at hospitals and healthcare facilities stopped in May. However, the CDC last week said the number