Ratings agency Moody’s Investors Service on Tuesday last week cut its outlook for China’s credit rating to “negative” from “stable,” citing risks from a slowing economy, increasing local government debts and a continued slump in the Chinese property market. Wasting little time, the agency on Wednesday also downgraded its credit outlooks for Hong Kong and Macau to “negative” from “stable,” citing the territories’ tight political, institutional, economic and financial linkages with China.
While Moody’s reaffirmed its “A1” sovereign rating for China, the outlook downgrade was its first for the country since 2017, reflecting the agency’s pessimistic view of China’s mounting debts and the effects on its economic prospects.
Moody’s lowered its economic growth forecasts of the world’s second-largest economy for next year and 2025 to 4 percent, compared with the Chinese government’s annual growth target of about 5 percent for this year. The agency also put its average growth estimate for China at about 3.8 percent by 2030, implying a similarly pessimistic outlook for the Chinese economy in the long term.
The assessment was consistent with Moody’s previous credit risk judgements and followed the same treatment it gave the US on Nov. 10. At that time, Moody’s lowered its outlook on the US’ credit rating to “negative” from “stable,” citing the continuous accumulation of US federal debts and a decline in Washington’s stability of debt repayment amid growing political polarization.
Moody’s shift in stance on China’s credit outlook has much to do with the country’s real-estate problems, which have not only triggered debt defaults by major property developers including Evergrande Group and Country Garden Holdings Co, but also delivered knock-on effects on local government debts and the national economy as a whole. On Sept. 14, the agency revised its outlook for China’s property sector to “negative” from “stable” and said it expected the market’s downside to continue over the next six to 12 months.
Fitch Ratings and S&P have not adjusted their credit outlooks for China yet, but they have issued warnings on the rising risks associated with the nation’s property market and are not optimistic about the economy’s growth momentum. That is because the property sector and related industries make up a quarter of China’s economic activity, they said.
Fitch last month forecast an up to 5 percent decline in China’s new home sales next year following an estimated contraction of 10 to 15 percent this year, amid sustained declines in transaction volumes and re-emerging pressure on home prices, while S&P on Oct. 24 said that in its worst-case scenario, China’s real GDP growth could drop to 2.9 percent next year if the property slump worsens.
In other words, the three major agencies all have similar views on China’s economic growth and property market trends, and they only differ on how badly the property woes could evolve to affect other key business sectors including capital goods, consumer products and banks, and China’s overall economy.
Given that Taiwanese banks and insurance companies have continued to slash their exposure to China to the lowest level in at least a decade, the Financial Supervisory Commission last week said the Moody’s downgrade had little effect on Taiwanese banks and insurers, as it claimed a combined exposure of NT$23.6 billion (US$752.22 million) to Chinese bonds as of the end of last month.
However, local financial institutions still have to pay extra attention to China’s property crisis and its local government debt problem, which are not likely to be solved in the short term. Instead, they need to be improved through structural reforms in the long term. It also requires Beijing to adopt broader macroeconomic policies to promote sustained economic growth.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the