The Chiayi City Council passed a motion to assess the possibility of establishing a regulated red-light district in the city. Chiayi Mayor Huang Min-hui (黃敏惠) said that the city government would examine the legality and feasibility of the proposal, but the most important thing is to consult the public.
In 2011, the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法) was amended to allow local governments to set up regulated red-light districts, yet no city mayor or county commissioner has done so. Establishing a red-light district is a sensitive issue, and no officials would want to go against existing social conventions. It is difficult to persuade the public to accept such an arrangement.
Undeniably, the majority of Taiwanese are bound by conventional norms of morality and customs, considering “sex” to be impure and regarding the sex industry with contempt. However, the truth is that the sex industry has existed for a long time in society. Indeed, it never went away.
Sex workers exist in every corner of the globe and have done so for some time. For one thing, people have sexual needs; for another, the sex industry does not disappear with economic growth. No matter how affluent a society is, there are women who live in poverty who face adverse circumstances, perhaps due to unforeseen changes to their lives, and need to take care of their families. To survive, they become sex workers.
Moreover, those who are unmarried, divorced or widowed have sexual needs, so too do the disabled and migrant workers. In this sense, there is a demand in place for such work. The problem is how the public considers this social issue.
In Europe, red-light districts have been established in cities including Germany’s Hamburg and Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Both areas have become popular sightseeing spots. These districts are regulated by the government, and so people’s sexual needs are met and sex workers are protected. With official governance, criminal rings do not have a chance to control and exploit sex workers, whose income and safety is therefore ensured.
Moreover, sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV/AIDS are more effectively managed. It is a triple-win situation for sex workers, clients and the government.
In Taiwan, the issue of establishing regulated red-light districts has been discussed for years. However, even though the Social Order Maintenance Act was revised to legalize it, no red-light district has yet been set up. One of the main reasons is that in Taiwan, officials are afraid of contravening social conventions and affecting children’s upbringing.
The truth is that in Taiwan, everyone knows where a “red-light” area is while pretending there is no such a thing. Everyone behaves as if there were no sex industry in Taiwan. In the cities, it exists in the form of a high-end hotel, guesthouse or club, and in rural areas, it is there, disguised as a restaurant or snack bar. These places are different in appearance and classified differently, but they all provide entertainment and sexual services.
Rather than hiding the issue and avoiding discussion, we should acknowledge it and deal with it. The sex industry should be institutionalized, legalized and brought to light. The most significant problem now is to change the public’s perceptions of the sex industry, which should not be discriminated against. The public’s needs should not be ignored either. The public should understand sex workers’ reasons for engaging in the industry.
The issue of setting up red-light districts must be discussed and considered in a rational and constructive manner.
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Emma Liu
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS