Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday reiterated that he is “deep-green at heart” and that he would mostly continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) national defense and foreign policies if elected.
However, he was still seriously considering forming a “blue-white” electoral alliance with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) less than a month ago, telling students he “hates the KMT, but loathes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) even more,” while constantly criticizing Tsai’s foreign policy these past few years.
Many critics have said that Ko’s latest remarks were aimed at attracting green-leaning swing voters, as recent polls showed a significant dip in his support after he broke up with the KMT, but they also raise questions of how much of a “political chameleon” he is, and if he has principles and beliefs he actually sticks to.
As the grandson of a 228 Incident victim, Ko had said the things he hates most are “mosquitoes, cockroaches and the KMT” and collaborated with the DPP in winning the Taipei mayoral election in 2014, but he has lost the trust of DPP supporters with his controversial policies and remarks — including that the “two sides of the Strait are one family.” He was no longer supported by the DPP in his 2018 re-election and established the TPP the next year after narrowly winning re-election.
In the past four years, the TPP has tried to position itself as a neutral party on the political spectrum between the “blue” and “green,” or pro-unification and pro-independence camps, with Ko often reiterating that “the blue and green camps are equally rotten,” but at the same time seemingly waging a personal vendetta against the DPP and the Tsai administration.
Ko in 2019 criticized Tsai and her foreign policy as “provoking China,” critiqued an annual national defense budget of NT$400 billion (US$12.75 billion) as being too much, tried to discredit the Tsai administration by claiming that “everyone around Tsai is engaged in corruption,” called the DPP a “one-party dictatorship” in 2020 and this year called the Tsai administration the “biggest scam syndicate.”
Ko’s rhetoric appears to have appealed to many young independent voters, who are frustrated and feel helpless about geopolitical uncertainty and are weary of the long-standing two-party rivalry, which is becoming more polarized due to increased threats from China in the past few years, so they place their hopes on his claims that he and his party could “change” Taiwan and practically solve people’s day-to-day issues.
A report on Taiwan’s election and young voters, published by the New York Times on Monday, cited National Chengchi University olitical science professor Lev Nachman, as saying that “so much of this youth support for Ko Wen-je is really driven not by actual admiration for the man and his policies, but by frustration.”
Although the idea of change might be enticing, not every change is a step forward, especially if the policy is not thoroughly planned out and carefully implemented. Unlike the six-point agreement Ko signed with KMT leaders last month to form an electoral alliance and coalition government, some major government decisions and agreements are irrevocable once settled.
While Ko could shift the blame for his blunders and ineffective policies during his first term as Taipei mayor to being an inexperienced political newcomer, as he has admitted he did not know what he was doing in his first year, he is no longer a novice and must be held accountable for his words and actions.
Swing voters frustrated with the two-party struggle and indifferent to geopolitics might just want change, but change should be made for the better, so they ought to at least take some time to carefully examine if a candidate’s words and actions are consistent and wisely choose a clear path for Taiwan, or else they might find themselves carelessly misplacing their trust in the hands of an opportunist.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s