Government pledges for climate adaptation at the COP28 summit have fallen far short of the target, with officials warning that resources to build resilience to wilder weather and rising seas could be diverted into a new “loss and damage” fund instead.
At a meeting at the Dubai talks late on Monday, rich countries offered only US$160 million in contributions to the Adaptation Fund — barely half of its US$300 million goal this year for projects such as flood defences and early-warning systems.
In contrast, the loss and damage fund approved at the start of COP28 aims to help vulnerable countries or communities recover from climate impacts that cannot be avoided, such as repairing devastated property after a storm or relocating people threatened by rising seas and protecting cultural heritage.
Several governments have mentioned the approval of that new fund among their reasons for offering less money for adaptation, Adaptation Fund head Mikko Ollikainen said.
“The new loss and damage fund, there is so much political momentum around it ... that countries have really dug deep to find resources for that,” said the UN climate conference in Dubai, calling that “very positive.”
However, he warned that without sufficient adaptation funding, the costs of damage from climate impacts will grow.
Developing nations are pushing for new adaptation finance targets to be included in how countries respond to the Global Stocktake — a UN assessment showing climate action is lagging far behind what is needed — but their efforts have been met with pushback by rich nations.
At the COP26 talks in Glasgow two years ago, the Adaptation Fund — established in 2001 and a leading global fund for such projects — raised a record US$356 million in new pledges, more than double the amount raised so far at COP28.
At COP26, wealthy governments also committed to double adaptation finance to at least US$40 billion a year by 2025, but have made little progress since.
This year is set to be the warmest since records began in 1940, due to climate change as well as an El Nino weather pattern, the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service said.
As a result, climate impacts including floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves have been felt across the world — and especially severely by developing nations, which have the least ability to withstand them.
Despite this, experts say funding for adaptation measures is far short of global needs and has been plateauing as many rich nations have failed to give more amid multiple political and economic crises including the Ukraine war and inflation.
A recent report by the UN Environment Programme said projected annual adaptation costs and needs were 10 to 18 times more than the actual finance available in 2021, and funding fell by US$4 billion between 2020 and 2021.
“We are in danger of allowing the narrative on loss and damage to crowd out the importance that is absolutely still necessary for adaptation,” Barbadian Prime Minister Mia Mottley told a press conference this week.
“What we want is to avert damage and avert loss before the event, which is why adaptation finance is critical,” she said.
In the first week of COP28, governments have pledged more than US$50 million to the loss and damage fund, led by the summit’s host, the United Arab Emirates, and Germany, which pledged US$100 million each.
But a major concern raised by officials and experts is whether the money promised is new cash and, if not, what other projects may lose their share of aid budgets — such as adaptation.
“We are all concerned,” UN Development Programme (UNDP) Administrator Achim Steiner said.
The UNDP helps countries implement projects backed by the Adaptation Fund.
“I think it is now up to those who are pledging their contributions to the loss and damage fund to demonstrate that this is not ... deducting funds from either mitigation or adaptation,” he said, adding that the UNDP is watching the situation carefully.
Governments must also pay more attention to the nature of these adaptation funds — such as whether they are loans or grants, said Ebony Holland, nature and climate policy lead at the International Institute for Environment and Development, a policy research body.
Countries most vulnerable to climate impacts want donors to provide more grants than cheap credit, and ensure the money is informed by the priorities of local communities instead of “funders and governments in distant countries,” she said.
“An overemphasis on the volume of funding shadows the critical need to ensure the quality of this finance,” Holland said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS