New Taipei City Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said that if elected, he would reopen dialogue with China and rebuild trust based on the principles of equality, respect and congeniality.
He proposed renegotiating the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), which has been suspended for eight years. He also welcomed the idea of permitting Chinese students to study and work in Taiwan.
However, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rejected the idea, saying it would be detrimental to young Taiwanese, especially their employment rights.
As part of its COVID-19 measures, China on April 9, 2020, suspended all applications from Chinese students to study in Taiwan.
However, the Ministry of Education lifted its own ban in July last year and last month opened the doors to Chinese students visiting Taiwan for exchanges or short-term study. It said it would continue to encourage Chinese students to study here.
As a lecturer who has tutored Chinese students, I am all for permitting them to study here, but not to stay and work.
Those who have taught Chinese students know they are usually hard-working, diligent and perform well in academic settings. Some even wonder why Taiwanese students would give up learning opportunities by skipping class.
They have always been impressed and envious of Taiwan’s culture and customs.
By permitting them to study, they would experience many aspects of Taiwanese life, especially democracy, freedom, diversity and openness.
After their stay, their experiences would promote and facilitate cross-strait understanding and exchange.
If Beijing does not introduce reciprocal employment measures for Taiwanese students, or if Taiwan permits Chinese students to work here without a
plan in place, it would be a heavy blow to the employment rights of young Taiwanese.
Lee Hong-jen is a professor of law at National Taichung University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS