New Taipei City Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said that if elected, he would reopen dialogue with China and rebuild trust based on the principles of equality, respect and congeniality.
He proposed renegotiating the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), which has been suspended for eight years. He also welcomed the idea of permitting Chinese students to study and work in Taiwan.
However, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rejected the idea, saying it would be detrimental to young Taiwanese, especially their employment rights.
As part of its COVID-19 measures, China on April 9, 2020, suspended all applications from Chinese students to study in Taiwan.
However, the Ministry of Education lifted its own ban in July last year and last month opened the doors to Chinese students visiting Taiwan for exchanges or short-term study. It said it would continue to encourage Chinese students to study here.
As a lecturer who has tutored Chinese students, I am all for permitting them to study here, but not to stay and work.
Those who have taught Chinese students know they are usually hard-working, diligent and perform well in academic settings. Some even wonder why Taiwanese students would give up learning opportunities by skipping class.
They have always been impressed and envious of Taiwan’s culture and customs.
By permitting them to study, they would experience many aspects of Taiwanese life, especially democracy, freedom, diversity and openness.
After their stay, their experiences would promote and facilitate cross-strait understanding and exchange.
If Beijing does not introduce reciprocal employment measures for Taiwanese students, or if Taiwan permits Chinese students to work here without a
plan in place, it would be a heavy blow to the employment rights of young Taiwanese.
Lee Hong-jen is a professor of law at National Taichung University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Rita Wang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS