New Taipei City Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said that if elected, he would reopen dialogue with China and rebuild trust based on the principles of equality, respect and congeniality.
He proposed renegotiating the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), which has been suspended for eight years. He also welcomed the idea of permitting Chinese students to study and work in Taiwan.
However, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rejected the idea, saying it would be detrimental to young Taiwanese, especially their employment rights.
As part of its COVID-19 measures, China on April 9, 2020, suspended all applications from Chinese students to study in Taiwan.
However, the Ministry of Education lifted its own ban in July last year and last month opened the doors to Chinese students visiting Taiwan for exchanges or short-term study. It said it would continue to encourage Chinese students to study here.
As a lecturer who has tutored Chinese students, I am all for permitting them to study here, but not to stay and work.
Those who have taught Chinese students know they are usually hard-working, diligent and perform well in academic settings. Some even wonder why Taiwanese students would give up learning opportunities by skipping class.
They have always been impressed and envious of Taiwan’s culture and customs.
By permitting them to study, they would experience many aspects of Taiwanese life, especially democracy, freedom, diversity and openness.
After their stay, their experiences would promote and facilitate cross-strait understanding and exchange.
If Beijing does not introduce reciprocal employment measures for Taiwanese students, or if Taiwan permits Chinese students to work here without a
plan in place, it would be a heavy blow to the employment rights of young Taiwanese.
Lee Hong-jen is a professor of law at National Taichung University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS