When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power in 2014, his party had three key ambitions: To remove the special status of Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority state; build a Hindu temple on the site of a centuries-old mosque; and introduce a single code to replace the maze of civil laws that govern personal issues like marriage, divorce and guardianship.
Each one is deeply controversial, seen by critics and minorities as an attempt to Hinduize India’s diverse 1.4 billion population, not the necessary step toward further unification the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would have us believe.
Modi has already achieved one: Kashmir was forcibly brought under the control of the federal government in 2019, although the Indian Supreme Court in September reserved judgment on a series of petitions challenging the constitutionality of that move. In January, he is expected to open a temple dedicated to the Hindu god Ram in the northern town of Ayodhya, built on the site where, in 1992, Hindu extremists tore down a 16th-century mosque, sparking riots that killed 2,000 people, mostly Muslims.
That just leaves the so-called uniform civil code. To anyone who cares about the rights of women and children, abolishing the faith-based laws that dominate day-to-day life would seem like an obvious step in the right direction. It would be, if undertaken by a government committed to democracy and upholding the rights of religious and tribal minorities, but this is not that government.
Instead, many fear that Modi’s hardline Hindu-nationalist administration would put a Hindu stamp on the civil code, and deal with the illiberal parts of other faiths — such as polygamy in Islam — while leaving the worst practices of Hinduism in place, said Milan Vaishnav, senior fellow and director of the South Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Take inheritance laws, which despite reforms can still allow sons to inherit ancestral property and leave widows and daughters with nothing, or the outlawed but still-widely practiced dowry system and its relation to deadly domestic violence.
Under Modi, the simultaneous growth of Hindu dominance over all aspects of society and the country’s inflated importance as a counterweight to China’s influence in the region, has been remarkable. Nations like the US, Australia and Japan — India’s partners in the Quad alliance — appear determined to ignore the government’s more toxic elements in favor of their strategic goal of containing Beijing. That, of course, gets more difficult when faced with accusations of a state-sponsored campaign of extra-judicial killings of Sikh separatists, first in Canada and then the recent revelation of a plot in the US.
Modi is seeking a third term in office next year — and his party’s victory in key state polls announced on Sunday could be read as a barometer for how the prime minister and his ruling party would fare in nationwide elections.
Each campaign has been hard fought, with Modi and his powerful right-hand man, Indian Minister of Home Affairs Amit Shah, attending at least 108 road shows and rallies between them in the weeks leading up to the vote. The BJP retained power in Madhya Pradesh state and won control from its rival, the Indian National Congress, in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh. The Indian National Congress party took the southern state of Telangana from the Bharat Rashtra Samithi party.
The BJP is leveraging Modi’s enduring personal popularity as it works toward the next year’s poll. As Vaishnav said, it is notable that the party has not named a chief ministerial candidate in any state — even Madhya Pradesh where there is an incumbent — as they have traditionally done.
“We cannot deny that there is the Modi factor in play,” he said. “When you have the most popular politician in India by a landslide, you go to the election with him.”
While the BJP is widely expected to win in the national elections next year, opposition parties, which have pledged to join forces, are not out of the race yet, but they face an uphill battle.
India’s economy is set to be the fastest growing of any major nation this year and next, with investors increasingly looking to put money there as an alternative to China. Should he retain power next year, we should expect an India that is more hyper-religious and even less tolerant of minorities than ever before. These state polls cannot be viewed as a proxy for what might happen at a federal level, but they do tell us one thing: Modi is a force to be reckoned with.
Ruth Pollard is a Bloomberg Opinion editor. Previously she was South and Southeast Asia government team leader at Bloomberg News and Middle East correspondent for the Sydney Morning Herald. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s