The publication of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s article on India’s presidency of the G20 in the Taipei Times (“India’s G20 presidency and multilateralism,” Nov. 30) is a welcome sign of growing India-Taiwan bonhomie.
The article was also carried in most Indian newspapers. The appearance of the article in Taiwanese media is also a message to Beijing. It is good that the article has enabled Taiwanese to learn more about India’s role, performance and achievements during India’s G20 presidency, which ended last month.
There is increasing coverage of India in Taiwanese media. Some of Modi’s observations in the article resonate with Taiwan’s perspectives on global issues, such as challenges to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic, sustainable development, climate change and reform of the UN system to keep the world organization in sync with new realities.
Modi has time and again reiterated India’s position in support of UN reform, pushing for India’s membership in the UN Security Council. Reform should not only include India’s membership in the council, but also Taiwan’s membership in the UN, as well as other agencies such as the WHO and the World Health Assembly.
It is an anachronism that India, the fifth-largest economy in the world, has not been added to the council’s five permanent members and Taiwan, a vibrant democracy of 23 million people, is not a UN member.
Modi’s article was published close on the heels of widely reported news that Taiwan is to expand permissions for Indian migrant workers.
India is slowly shedding its inhibitions and reaching out to Taiwan, and there is a groundswell of goodwill for Taiwan not only among the people of India, but also in the political spectrum, in Indian academia and the fraternity of think tanks, and in the media.
Even Indian politicians of stature and eminence such as parliamentarian Sujeet Kumar do not mince words regarding their admiration for Taiwan and its pulsating democracy.
The Indian Parliamentary Committee on External Affairs, headed by Shashi Tharoor, has recommended outreach to Taiwan.
Former Indian foreign secretary Vijay Gokhale in his book The Long Game bemoaned India’s handling of Tibet and Taiwan issues, writing that they were conducted in haste without securing India’s interests.
Despite growing awareness about Taiwan, and appreciation and admiration for it, India regrettably does not have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei, even though it does have substantive relations with Taipei touching upon the entire gamut, just as with other countries.
Physical distance might separate India and Taiwan from each other, and the two vibrant democracies might not be comparable, yet there is a host of convergences between the two political entities. The most important convergence is the pulsating and enduring electoral politics, which has developed contemporaneously: India since 1947 and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan since 1949.
It is not a coincidence that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led by Modi and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power in 2014 and 2016 respectively. Modi and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) were re-elected in 2019 and 2020.
India and Taiwan are going to polls early next year, Taiwan next month and India a few months later. The BJP and the DPP are pitted against a formidable alliance of opposition parties.
The Congress party ruled India until the BJP came to power in 1977, while the DPP came to power for the first time in 2000, defeating the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The emergence of multiple political parties in India and Taiwan is yet another facet of deepening democracies.
However, India and Taiwan face the challenge of the communist regime in China, which is hell-bent on maligning and debunking democracy.
Modi and Tsai face the challenges from China with great resolve and without buckling to intimidation in the Taiwan Strait or over the Line of Actual Control on the Sino-Indian border.
The two leaders know very well that engagement with the neighbor is not an option, but a strategic necessity.
Be that as it may, India and Taiwan need to learn from each other in the art and craft of democratic governance, and the grammar of coalition politics to strengthen the edifice of democracy, and vindicate the triumph of democracy as a panacea to meet the hopes and aspiration of the people.
It is only through democratic means, and not through the regimentation of party-controlled totalitarianism, that people’s livelihoods and dignity can be enhanced.
Freedom is sacrosanct.
It is through the institutions and structures of democracy such as an independent judiciary, rule of law, a free press, academic freedom, a vibrant media and periodic elections to representative bodies that citizens can realize their full potential, and create reservoirs of wealth and wisdom.
Democracy has pitfalls, but with all its imperfections, it is a desirable option, because democracy being an open system, there is always room for course correction and remedial measures, which is not possible in a totalitarian and communist regime.
Rup Narayan Das is a former senior officer of the Lok Sabha Secretariat of the Indian parliament, a Delhi-based China academic and previously a Taiwan Fellow. The views expressed here are his own.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS