The publication of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s article on India’s presidency of the G20 in the Taipei Times (“India’s G20 presidency and multilateralism,” Nov. 30) is a welcome sign of growing India-Taiwan bonhomie.
The article was also carried in most Indian newspapers. The appearance of the article in Taiwanese media is also a message to Beijing. It is good that the article has enabled Taiwanese to learn more about India’s role, performance and achievements during India’s G20 presidency, which ended last month.
There is increasing coverage of India in Taiwanese media. Some of Modi’s observations in the article resonate with Taiwan’s perspectives on global issues, such as challenges to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic, sustainable development, climate change and reform of the UN system to keep the world organization in sync with new realities.
Modi has time and again reiterated India’s position in support of UN reform, pushing for India’s membership in the UN Security Council. Reform should not only include India’s membership in the council, but also Taiwan’s membership in the UN, as well as other agencies such as the WHO and the World Health Assembly.
It is an anachronism that India, the fifth-largest economy in the world, has not been added to the council’s five permanent members and Taiwan, a vibrant democracy of 23 million people, is not a UN member.
Modi’s article was published close on the heels of widely reported news that Taiwan is to expand permissions for Indian migrant workers.
India is slowly shedding its inhibitions and reaching out to Taiwan, and there is a groundswell of goodwill for Taiwan not only among the people of India, but also in the political spectrum, in Indian academia and the fraternity of think tanks, and in the media.
Even Indian politicians of stature and eminence such as parliamentarian Sujeet Kumar do not mince words regarding their admiration for Taiwan and its pulsating democracy.
The Indian Parliamentary Committee on External Affairs, headed by Shashi Tharoor, has recommended outreach to Taiwan.
Former Indian foreign secretary Vijay Gokhale in his book The Long Game bemoaned India’s handling of Tibet and Taiwan issues, writing that they were conducted in haste without securing India’s interests.
Despite growing awareness about Taiwan, and appreciation and admiration for it, India regrettably does not have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei, even though it does have substantive relations with Taipei touching upon the entire gamut, just as with other countries.
Physical distance might separate India and Taiwan from each other, and the two vibrant democracies might not be comparable, yet there is a host of convergences between the two political entities. The most important convergence is the pulsating and enduring electoral politics, which has developed contemporaneously: India since 1947 and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan since 1949.
It is not a coincidence that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led by Modi and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power in 2014 and 2016 respectively. Modi and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) were re-elected in 2019 and 2020.
India and Taiwan are going to polls early next year, Taiwan next month and India a few months later. The BJP and the DPP are pitted against a formidable alliance of opposition parties.
The Congress party ruled India until the BJP came to power in 1977, while the DPP came to power for the first time in 2000, defeating the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The emergence of multiple political parties in India and Taiwan is yet another facet of deepening democracies.
However, India and Taiwan face the challenge of the communist regime in China, which is hell-bent on maligning and debunking democracy.
Modi and Tsai face the challenges from China with great resolve and without buckling to intimidation in the Taiwan Strait or over the Line of Actual Control on the Sino-Indian border.
The two leaders know very well that engagement with the neighbor is not an option, but a strategic necessity.
Be that as it may, India and Taiwan need to learn from each other in the art and craft of democratic governance, and the grammar of coalition politics to strengthen the edifice of democracy, and vindicate the triumph of democracy as a panacea to meet the hopes and aspiration of the people.
It is only through democratic means, and not through the regimentation of party-controlled totalitarianism, that people’s livelihoods and dignity can be enhanced.
Freedom is sacrosanct.
It is through the institutions and structures of democracy such as an independent judiciary, rule of law, a free press, academic freedom, a vibrant media and periodic elections to representative bodies that citizens can realize their full potential, and create reservoirs of wealth and wisdom.
Democracy has pitfalls, but with all its imperfections, it is a desirable option, because democracy being an open system, there is always room for course correction and remedial measures, which is not possible in a totalitarian and communist regime.
Rup Narayan Das is a former senior officer of the Lok Sabha Secretariat of the Indian parliament, a Delhi-based China academic and previously a Taiwan Fellow. The views expressed here are his own.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS