Taiwan’s Ministry of Labor and India’s Ministry of External Affairs have confirmed that the two countries plan to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) this month on recruiting Indians to work in Taiwan. While this marks another step in deepening ties between the two nations, it has also stirred debate, as misunderstandings and disinformation about the plan abound.
Taiwan is grappling with a shortage of workers due to a low birthrate and a society that is projected to turn super-aged by 2025. Official statistics show that Taiwan has a labor shortfall of at least 60,000 to 80,000, which is expected to widen to more than 400,000 within six years. Opening the nation to workers from India is one solution to addressing this problem. It would also help deepen economic and other non-diplomatic relations with India — the world’s most populous country and the fifth-largest economy, with its GDP forecast to grow 6.4 to 7 percent this year.
However, the MOU negotiations have sparked debate, as evidenced by a small-scale rally against the plan on Sunday. One major piece of misinformation spreading on social media claims that the government plans to bring in 100,000 Indian workers, threatening national security and increasing the crime rate. The Ministry of Labor has dismissed the figure, saying that the MOU is still under negotiation and that details would be discussed after it is signed.
Statistics show that while there are 18 million Indian workers employed worldwide, including in Singapore, the US and the Middle East, the crime rate involving Indian workers is lower than that among local citizens. For instance, data released by the Singapore Police Force for 2019 showed a crime rate of 227 per 100,000 Indian workers, compared with 435 per 100,000 among Singaporeans. In Taiwan, National Police Agency data showed that last year the crime rate among migrant workers was 59.46 cases per 100,000 people, lower than the 114.12 per 100,000 among Taiwanese.
The National Security Bureau and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have also warned about messages from thousands of abnormal or fake accounts and disseminated by some Chinese media accounts to manipulate public opinion on this issue. These are part of cognitive warfare employed by foreign forces, such as China, to harm Taiwan’s international image and cause tensions between Taipei and New Delhi.
Since the amendment of the Employment Services Act (就業服務法) in 1992, Taiwan has opened its doors to migrant workers. There are currently more than 750,000 migrant workers in Taiwan, with the majority from Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines. There are also 2,700 Indian professionals employed in the high-tech and financial sectors.
While the unemployment rate in Taiwan has dropped to a 23-year low and the average annual wage has risen to an eight-year high, migrant workers have played an important role, especially in filling jobs that Taiwanese might not be interested in doing.
As the Indian government has recently signed employment agreements with at least 13 countries, including Japan, France and the UK, a Taiwan-India job pact could provide Taiwan with one more option for skilled and multilingual workers.
The government could start with small-scale recruitment of workers for target industries, on the one hand creating more mutual understanding between people in the two countries while, on the other, accumulating experience to establish more supporting measures to make Indian workers key partners in Taiwan’s national development.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS