Taiwan is rightly famous for its food culture. Whether boba tea or beef noodle soup, we love to eat. Online platforms, restaurants with their own delivery services and new food delivery services are enabling consumers to enjoy their favorite foods quickly and easily.
Working parents who need a night off from cooking, students craving energy to study for their exams, elderly Taiwanese who find it hard to move from their home or anyone who just wants a tasty treat at any time of the day: All have come to treasure their ability to use food delivery apps.
ECONOMY
Today, over 60 percent of restaurants and many grocery chains in Taiwan offer home delivery, ranging from national treasures like Din Tai Fung to Wan-you-chuan — a must-go-to Jinhua Ham vendor in the Nanmen wet market.
The growth of food delivery has led to increased sales and greater value for restaurants. Meanwhile, supermarkets, convenience stores and specialist retailers are increasingly turning to apps like Uber Eats to ensure their customers can get groceries, toiletries and other products.
In a study by Public First, Uber Eats by itself created NT$10.3 billion (US$327.87 million) in additional value for restaurant and merchant-partners in Taiwan in 2021 alone.
COURIERS
At the core of the food delivery ecosystem in Taiwan are the couriers. They come from a wide range of backgrounds. We see college students looking to earn a little extra income, young parents balancing work and caregiving responsibilities or new business owners needing extra income while they launch their ventures.
To better understand how we could help couriers have the best experience while partnering with Uber, I recently met with representatives of several courier unions.
Uber Eats couriers have no shifts and are free to work whenever they want. Couriers tell us that they enjoy this flexibility and do not want to be treated as employees, but they also want some of the benefits, such as guaranteed minimum earnings and basic benefits and protections that are currently only available to employees. We agree that flexibility should not come at the expense of benefits and protections.
However, current laws do not allow for this kind of hybrid arrangement. Currently, if couriers were to be provided with additional benefits and protections, it would come at the cost of their flexibility.
‘THIRD WAY’
That is why today we are calling for new laws in Taiwan, applicable to all industry players and couriers nationwide, that would create a “third way” other than traditional employment and independent contractor status. This would give them the protections of minimum earnings as well as benefits they deserve, and also preserve the flexibility that couriers value.
While our internal data suggest that couriers on the Uber Eats platform earn more than the minimum wage for the time that they are doing deliveries, we are also calling for government-mandated minimum earning standards for all platforms.
These standards need to strike a balance between ensuring good earnings for couriers while ensuring the “three-sided” marketplace of consumers, restaurants and couriers continues to thrive.
Governments from Australia to Chile, along with several states in the US, are moving toward this concept of a “third way.”
At this important juncture, we stand committed to working with industry, couriers and governments to develop modern laws that would improve earning opportunities for couriers across the industry.
Chai Lee is the general manager of Uber Eats Taiwan.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s