Europe and Taiwan share an interest in advancing a free and open international order and in protecting democratic governance from authoritarian threats. An assertive China enabling an aggressive Russia has pulled them closer in their joint efforts.
Europe and Taiwan should now engage in cooperation in strategic investment by linking their digital connectivity policies in the developing world. Together, they could empower developing countries to drive their own development and build up strategic resilience.
The EU’s response to China’s assertiveness has so far been halfhearted, limited by institutional resistance, member states’ divisions and a lack of political will. As EU-China relations have grown more complex over the decades, the EU’s position has become more fragmented, with China exploiting divisions. Yet things are shifting.
“China has changed” is the widely held consensus across the bloc, so Europe has to change too, and not only in its approach to China, but in the way in which it engages the developing world, where Beijing has made significant inroads over the past decade. With an assertive approach backed by generous funding under its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Beijing has promoted an alternative governance model, promising to deliver on both development and security. With questions as to whether Europe has “lost the Global South” to China still open, the EU is now slowly catching up.
It took years for the EU’s Global Gateway, launched in 2021, to finally take off, with its identity crisis in terms of pursuing development assistance vs. foreign policy objectives still ongoing.
At the Global Gateway Forum held in October — just days after the 10th anniversary of China’s BRI — the Commission revealed concrete examples of how the instrument would bring the “right kind” of investment — and therefore offer “better choices” to countries.
In this regard, the EU shares another interest with Taiwan, which is to counter China’s growing authoritarian influence in the developing world. China continues to pose an existential threat to Taiwan. Ahead of Taiwan’s presidential election in January, Beijing has doubled down on efforts to manipulate the process to serve its interests and discredit democracy. In response, Taiwan has been investing in democratic resilience at home and building like-minded partnerships abroad.
Beyond Taiwan, China represents a serious threat to regional peace. China’s economic coercion, military maneuvers in the Taiwan Strait and pressure despite its reliance on Taiwan’s semiconductors, endangers stability in the entire Indo-Pacific region. Beijing’s efforts have nonetheless backfired; the EU and its member states are upgrading, rather than downscaling cooperation with Taiwan. Shared concerns over an assertive China supporting an aggressive Russia following its renewed aggression against Ukraine since last year, created opportunities for Europe and Taiwan to coordinate their cooperation in and with the developing world.
In its resolution last September, the European Parliament urged the Commission to consider connectivity projects and coinvestment in partnership between the EU’s Global Gateway and Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy, “with a view to fostering trade and political relationships as well as stability in the Indo-Pacific region.”
Since 2016, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) pivotal regional policy for Asia, the New Southbound Policy (NSP), has pursued stronger cooperation with Southeast Asia through people-to-people contact, capacity-building and think tank diplomacy. Taiwan is capitalizing on momentum in its growing internationalization, a process that the EU as a whole and its member states have contributed to. Linking their digital connectivity policies would further consolidate the process.
The EU’s development arm, the Directorate-General for International Partnerships, the body in charge of handling the Global Gateway, and Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs should establish a Global South Connectivity Working Group (GSWG) to set a strategic frame to complement each other’s connectivity priorities in the developing world and create synergies in order to scale up high-quality strategic investment together. The EU and Taiwan already have a solid bilateral cooperation framework in place, including various sectoral working groups. The GSWG could be a creative way to expand cooperation.
Research and innovation are areas already included in the Global Gateway and the NSP, in line with the UN’s sustainable development goals, indispensable to creating resilient societies and empowering individuals to exercise agency. In the words of Tsai, Taiwan is committed to integrating its capacity in high-tech industries to promote a digital New Southbound initiative. Together with European partners, they could boost digital transformation as a key driver of sustainable development.
Backing its Global Gateway rhetoric with substance is vital for the EU’s credibility. In the words of Ambassador Romana Vlahutin, former special EU envoy for connectivity, the EU policy toward the Global South needs a reset guided by a strategic foreign and security mindset.
Developing countries clearly prefer investment over aid, she explained, which would allow them to climb up the value chain and benefit from knowledge transfer on a transformational scale.
The EU and Taiwan must recognize the value of partnering up with developing countries. This requires political will — both in Taiwan and in Europe — and an inclusive and strategic approach. If done right, the EU and Taiwan could contribute to the growth and resilience of the developing world, in partnership with developing countries.
Zsuzsa Anna Ferenczy is assistant professor at National Dong Hwa University in Hualien and a former political adviser in the European Parliament.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s