Domestic production of ships and submarines is an important force-building plan for the navy. To reinforce the navy’s strength, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on Nov. 17 unveiled a plan to build an anti-air light frigate at a keel-laying ceremony in Kaohsiung’s Zuoying (左營) naval base. Six each of two types of frigates — anti-air and anti-submarine frigates — are expected to be built to boost the capacity of the existing second-rate fleet.
In recent years, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy has frequently pushed close the waters east of the Taiwan Strait median line, exhausting Taiwan’s military resources. In addition, the PLA’s fleet consists of significant numbers of first-rate, second-rate and third-rate ships.
Given the degree of intimidation by the PLA, it is not cost-effective for Taiwan’s navy, which has a smaller fleet and relatively limited options regarding vessel types, to send a much larger first-rate ship to intercept the PLA’s second-rate ships.
Meanwhile, due to their smaller tonnage, it is not easy for third-rate ships to carry out long maritime operations. Building more second-rate ships is therefore a pragmatic move.
Information disclosed by the media and the military shows that the biggest highlight of the anti-air light frigate is that it is equipped with a vertical launching system that can carry 32 domestically produced TC-2N (海劍二) anti-aircraft missiles. The missiles’ excellent performance coupled with the indigenous vertical launching system makes the light frigate’s engagement speed far superior to other launching vehicles.
Vertical launching systems have become standard equipment for the capital ships of several navies, including the US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer, the Japanese Self-Defense Forces’ Atago-class destroyer, the Republic of Korea Navy’s Sejong the Great-class destroyer and the Republic of Singapore Navy’s Formidable-class frigate. The biggest advantages of the vertical launching system are its fast engagement, zero blind spot for shooting and relatively large amounts of ammunition.
More importantly, the indigenous vertical launching system represents Taiwan’s progress in indigenous warships and its official integration with international standards.
Ray Song is a doctoral student in Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS