As China-founded e-commerce behemoth Shein moves to list in New York, US lawmakers are again calling on it to prove that forced labor is not used to make its US$5 T-shirts and US$10 sweaters.
Shein confidentially filed for an initial public offering (IPO) on Monday and could launch sales of its shares some time next year. The Singapore-based company has not determined the size of the deal or the valuation at IPO. Bloomberg last month reported that it targeted up to US$90 billion in the float.
Founded in 2012, Shein has been eyeing a US IPO for at least three years but has been deterred by headwinds that included tensions between Beijing and Washington.
The online fast-fashion retailer, which manufactures most of its merchandise in China, faces criticism that Uighur forced labor is used to make its low-priced apparel and home goods.
Critics are concerned that Shein might use contract manufacturers in China’s Xinjiang region, where advocates and governments have accused China of interning Uighurs and other largely Muslim minority groups. Beijing denies any abuses.
Convincing regulators that its supply chain is clean would likely be a major regulatory hurdle as Shein works to convince the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that its shares should be traded publicly.
“If the fast-fashion giant Shein wants to go public in the US, they should have to prove to American consumers that their products are not sourced from forced labor,” Democratic US Representative Jennifer Wexton said in a statement on Tuesday.
The congresswoman earlier this year led a bipartisan call for the SEC to halt Shein’s IPO until it verifies that the company does not use forced labor within its supply chain.
A separate group of Republican attorneys general from 16 US states has also asked the SEC to audit the company, and Shein has been investigated by two separate congressional committees over its sourcing and use of a trade loophole that allows most of its products to enter the US duty free.
A spokesperson for Shein in a statement on Tuesday said the company has a zero-tolerance policy for forced labor and was “eager to engage and continue to be transparent with all stakeholders, including Representative Wexton and her staff.”
Shein has previously told Reuters it has no contract manufacturers in Xinjiang.
A spokesperson for the SEC said the agency does not comment on any individual entity’s filings.
Megan Penick, a public securities lawyer at Michelman & Robinson, said it is unlikely to see a “direct block” from the SEC, but the agency could make the process difficult for Shein by making “the disclosure requirements so detailed, and, perhaps extreme, that it makes it seem ... trying to go public cannot be achieved.”
“There may be issues with the forced labor allegations and the IP [intellectual property] issues that may make it hard for [Shein] to be able to answer the questions to the satisfaction of the SEC,” Penick said.
Public disclosures show that Shein has spent US$1.28 million on US Capitol Hill lobbying this year as it prepares to go public.
The company has also met privately with lawmakers, including some of its biggest critics, in an effort to shift its reputation in Washington, several congressional aides said.
One source familiar with the matter said that representatives for Shein emphasized the retailer’s efforts to diversify its supply chain from China to other countries, including India.
Shein also touted its efforts to bring more China-made goods to the US in bulk on traditional container ships, which requires paying tariffs on those items.
“Shein is fundamentally a Chinese company and investors should approach Chinese offerings with extreme caution. Its attempt to go public should prompt a closer look at its business practices, especially its links to slave labor and its evasion of US customs laws,” Republican US Senator Marco Rubio said.
“I will closely monitor Shein’s disclosures in the lead-up to its IPO,” added Rubio, who in June criticized the retailer’s lobbying efforts in a letter distributed to other senators.
Republican US Representative Chris Smith, chairman of the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China, has also criticized Shein’s lobbying efforts.
“Any investor in this company should be wary of the material risks involved in Shein’s business model ... particularly as Congress is demanding an end to forced labor and closure of import subsidies for Chinese companies,” Smith said.
In its most recent social impact report, Shein highlighted its partnership with Oritain, a company also used by the US government to test cotton for links to China’s Xinjiang region.
Oritain chief executive officer Grant Cochrane on Tuesday said that the testing company conducted 2,762 tests of Shein yarn, fabric and finished products from August last year to last month, and that 1.7 percent tested positive for cotton from unapproved regions. The average prevalence of cotton from unapproved regions among brands that work with Oritain was 6 percent this year, the company said.
Critics, however, say that the testing does not adequately screen the millions of garments exported globally by Shein every year.
The SEC’s handling of Shein’s IPO would be crucial for other e-commerce players including ByteDance’s TikTok and PDD Group’s Temu, which might consider going public in the US, Penick said.
Shein’s IPO is “going to be raising issues [for the SEC] that may later be applied across the board to all China-based or China-related companies that are going public,” Penick said.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s