Split tickets not always best
In the legislative elections in 2020, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) number of regional legislative seats increased, but the DPP only won 33.9 percent of the total party votes for the legislators-at-large, which was similar to that of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) despite the KMT’s defeat in the regional legislative elections at that time.
The reason for this was that many voters who supported the pro-local regime voted for the DPP in the regional legislative elections, while casting their party votes to small parties with the same ideologies through split-ticket voting.
I cast my party votes for the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) in 2008 and 2012, the New Power Party (NPP) in 2016 and the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) in 2020. The TSU and TSP failed to cross the 5 percent threshold to have any legislator-at-large in 2008 and 2020 respectively.
For the upcoming legislative elections, former KMT presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) is on top of the KMT’s nomination list for legislators-at-large, and he has been eyeing the legislative speaker’s seat. Some other nominees on the list include former Tainan City councilor Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介), who claims to embrace the Republic of China (ROC), but was once reluctant to wave an ROC flag at a 2019 campaign rally in Tainan, as well as the second-generation members of several questionable political families who try to portray a clean image. Plus, since the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is likely to have more legislators-at-large this time, the TPP has been bragging about itself lately. Under such circumstances, I have decided to cast my party vote for the DPP, instead of voting for a split ticket.
For Taiwan’s legislature, there should be representative figures for the weak such as Jing Chuan Child Safety Foundation CEO Lin Yue-chin (林月琴), who is on top of the DPP’s nomination list, and political warriors such as assistant professor of civil engineering Wang Yi-chuan (王義川), who are able to refute Han, Hsieh and the TPP’s nominees for legislators-at-large like Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌). As long as the voters could focus their party votes on the DPP, even though Wang is in the 14th spot on the party’s nomination list and not within the first 12 nominees, also known as the “safe list,” he could still become a “safe” candidate.
Yi He-hsuan
Tainan
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS