After a shock court ruling, Europe has suddenly found itself facing a question crucial to its prosperity and its ability to combat climate change: Can Germany, the region’s largest economy, meet the scale of public investment required to both revive growth and support the green transition?
Hopefully the country’s fractious ruling coalition could muster the will to say “yes.”
For Germany, ramping up public investment should be a no-brainer. A major transformation of its outdated physical and digital infrastructure is required for greener energy and industry to flourish. With some of the lowest sovereign debt burdens in Europe, it has the financial wherewithal. Yet policymakers are fettered: A constitutional “debt brake” limits deficit spending, no matter how beneficial, except in narrowly defined emergencies.
The government has sought to muddle through, finding ways to circumvent this constraint. In his former role as finance minister, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz reallocated about 60 billion euros (US$65.4 billion) of pandemic-response money to an extrabudgetary fund for future investment in areas such as renewable energy, hydrogen and charging infrastructure — significant, but still small compared with the hundreds of billions of euros in total annual (public and private) investment needed to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Now, even this modest commitment is in jeopardy. Germany’s Constitutional Court has ruled that Scholz’s fund transfer was unlawful. The decision might also undermine other special funds aimed at fulfilling policy goals such as stabilizing the economy after last year’s energy crisis. All told, hundreds of billions of euros in public spending are at stake.
Despite the chaos it creates, the court’s ruling is welcome. Ideally, it would force Germany’s leaders to deal with the country’s fiscal priorities squarely. Finding common ground is not going to be easy, given the starkly divergent positions of the three parties in the coalition government. Whatever commitments emerge, though, would at least be more credible than a collection of extrabudgetary funds.
The best outcome for Germany, Europe and the global climate is clear: Reform the debt brake — which has now been “temporarily” suspended for the fourth consecutive year — to make way for much-needed investment in everything from the power grid to broadband capacity. The country’s storied fiscal restraint has become an impediment to progress. Germany could lead Europe into a better and greener future.
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS