Since the rancorous and histrionic breakup of the planned “blue-white alliance,” polls have shown a massive drop in support for Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), whose support rate has dropped to 20 percent. Young people and pan-blue supporters seem to be ditching him.
Within a few weeks, Ko has gone from being the most sought after candidate to seeking a comeback.
A few months ago, he was the one holding all the cards and calling the shots, with everything in place for a rise to stardom. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was still dealing with doubts from its terrible performance in last year’s local elections, while the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), has proved to be a relatively weak character who could not generate excitement. As long as Ko stayed ahead of Hou, he had a good chance of winning the three-horse race.
For Ko, winning the presidency would be a bonus. As the chairman of a third party that is just starting to expand its influence and power, he has his eyes set on boosting his party’s share of legislative seats. By characterizing the DPP as being in dereliction of duty, among other issues, he sparked a sense of deprivation and exploitation among the public, and established himself as the champion of an anti-DPP coalition.
As a master strategist, he has been careful not to cross the line or offend KMT supporters, because he is relying on strategic voting.
If he finishes second in the presidential election and the TPP emerges as the biggest opposition party ahead of the KMT, that would satisfy him.
However, Ko’s capriciousness and duplicity have come back to bite him. His flirtation with the KMT culminated in a joint statement by both parties last week, but being unable to bear the pressure from his party, supporters and his sobbing family, Ko broke the deal.
At the last-ditch meeting at the Grand Hyatt Taipei, Hou threw Ko under the bus by reading aloud text messages, resulting in the two parties going their separate ways.
Ko’s act of self-defeat — being open to run as second fiddle to Hou, whether out of fear of losing or due to a moment of frailty — awakened his supporters and TPP members to his true nature: The leader who vowed to bring reform and “return the country to young people” betrayed their trust by being willing to be vice president on a combined ticket.
While he might be seen as a master plotter, playing politicians against each another, perhaps the real Ko is one who seeks to “fake it until he makes it” while hoping people do not see through him.
Without a vision for the nation, he improvises on the campaign trail when he faces trouble.
It is ironic that Ko pleads for his supporters to not write him off when it was he who initiated the planned alliance with the KMT, showing that he does not have the spine for responsibility, and needs his wife and mother to save him.
With Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) joining Hou on the KMT ticket, Hou’s support has spiked, with deep-blue supporters rallying behind him. Ko, on the other hand, seems to have been abandoned, lacking allies and financial aid.
Even though he is not out of the game yet, Ko faces an uphill battle, just as Hou did a few months ago.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS