A Chinese official on Tuesday said that the Royal Australian Navy should notify China before operating in the South and East China seas.
Liu Jianchao (劉建超), head of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) international department, made the comment in response to questions about an incident in which the Chinese navy allegedly used sonar against Australian divers in waters off Japan.
The incident, which occurred in international waters in Japan’s exclusive economic zone, occurred because the Australian navy was “in disputed waters,” Liu said. Australia should provide China with “any kind of pre-consultations or notification” to prevent misunderstandings from happening between the two militaries, he said, according to a Reuters report.
China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has repeatedly operated dangerously close to foreign militaries’ vessels and aircraft in recent years in the region, despite numerous protests lodged with Beijing.
Beijing has generally responded with denial and deflection. It has rarely made demands of foreign countries involved in the incidents.
However, Liu’s demand that Australia notify Beijing before operating in international waters reflects an emboldening attitude of the CCP. The China Coast Guard Law passed in January 2021 authorizes Chinese Coast Guard ships to fire on foreign vessels and destroy structures on disputed islands and other features China claims in the region.
That law contradicts the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), but recent aggressions toward the Philippines in contested waters, and now the statements by Liu, suggest that China plans to justify its aggressive behavior by invoking its law. This is supported by Liu’s assertion regarding Australia’s activities in the East China Sea.
“The reason why the Australian naval ships were there was really to contain China — so that is the message that we have been getting,” he said.
China is known for using “gray zone” tactics — actions taken below the threshold of war, or which can be committed with plausible deniability — to coerce its opponents into getting what it wants.
China will continue with this “salami slicing” until it is met with a firm response. Countries that oppose China’s actions in the Indo-Pacific far outnumber any allies that Beijing can muster in support.
China knows it is unlikely to be met with opposition when acting aggressively toward international surveillance or research teams acting alone or in small numbers. That is why democracies need to collaborate on such missions. China would not dare to intimidate a joint operational team involving two or more countries conducting research or surveillance with a military escort.
Foreign powers could also take other action to demonstrate their resolve to protect freedom of navigation. For example, they could detain or shadow PLA and Chinese Coast Guard vessels and aircraft that commit aggressions, or sanction China. An international coalition could also increase deployment in the region, signaling to Beijing that every action will be met.
Australia said that when its divers were allegedly injured by Chinese sonar, the Australian vessel had stopped to clear a fishing net from its propellers, and had communicated this to the approaching PLA vessel. Even had the incident occurred in Chinese waters, such an attack would be unjustified. The normal, and professional, course of action would have been to offer assistance.
That the incident happened in international waters, and the Chinese response was to act dangerously, demonstrates the disregard that China has for international conventions. The international community must act to deter further aggression from China. Doing so is imperative to the interests of all democracies, including Taiwan.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s