A Chinese official on Tuesday said that the Royal Australian Navy should notify China before operating in the South and East China seas.
Liu Jianchao (劉建超), head of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) international department, made the comment in response to questions about an incident in which the Chinese navy allegedly used sonar against Australian divers in waters off Japan.
The incident, which occurred in international waters in Japan’s exclusive economic zone, occurred because the Australian navy was “in disputed waters,” Liu said. Australia should provide China with “any kind of pre-consultations or notification” to prevent misunderstandings from happening between the two militaries, he said, according to a Reuters report.
China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has repeatedly operated dangerously close to foreign militaries’ vessels and aircraft in recent years in the region, despite numerous protests lodged with Beijing.
Beijing has generally responded with denial and deflection. It has rarely made demands of foreign countries involved in the incidents.
However, Liu’s demand that Australia notify Beijing before operating in international waters reflects an emboldening attitude of the CCP. The China Coast Guard Law passed in January 2021 authorizes Chinese Coast Guard ships to fire on foreign vessels and destroy structures on disputed islands and other features China claims in the region.
That law contradicts the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), but recent aggressions toward the Philippines in contested waters, and now the statements by Liu, suggest that China plans to justify its aggressive behavior by invoking its law. This is supported by Liu’s assertion regarding Australia’s activities in the East China Sea.
“The reason why the Australian naval ships were there was really to contain China — so that is the message that we have been getting,” he said.
China is known for using “gray zone” tactics — actions taken below the threshold of war, or which can be committed with plausible deniability — to coerce its opponents into getting what it wants.
China will continue with this “salami slicing” until it is met with a firm response. Countries that oppose China’s actions in the Indo-Pacific far outnumber any allies that Beijing can muster in support.
China knows it is unlikely to be met with opposition when acting aggressively toward international surveillance or research teams acting alone or in small numbers. That is why democracies need to collaborate on such missions. China would not dare to intimidate a joint operational team involving two or more countries conducting research or surveillance with a military escort.
Foreign powers could also take other action to demonstrate their resolve to protect freedom of navigation. For example, they could detain or shadow PLA and Chinese Coast Guard vessels and aircraft that commit aggressions, or sanction China. An international coalition could also increase deployment in the region, signaling to Beijing that every action will be met.
Australia said that when its divers were allegedly injured by Chinese sonar, the Australian vessel had stopped to clear a fishing net from its propellers, and had communicated this to the approaching PLA vessel. Even had the incident occurred in Chinese waters, such an attack would be unjustified. The normal, and professional, course of action would have been to offer assistance.
That the incident happened in international waters, and the Chinese response was to act dangerously, demonstrates the disregard that China has for international conventions. The international community must act to deter further aggression from China. Doing so is imperative to the interests of all democracies, including Taiwan.
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from