The nation’s political parties have released their legislator-at-large lists for the Jan. 13 elections, with the names topping the lists showing the differences in their focus and values.
The 113-seat Legislative Yuan consists of 73 seats elected from single-member legislative constituencies, six for indigenous candidates and 34 at-large seats, which are distributed among parties that meet the minimum threshold of 5 percent of all party votes cast.
Each party is entitled to submit a ranked list of 34 nominees for at-large seats.
The Democratic Progress Party (DPP) has nominated 16 men and 18 women, with Jing Chuan Child Safety Foundation chief executive officer Lin Yue-chin (林月琴) topping the list, followed by National Taipei University’s Graduate School of Criminology director Puma Shen (沈伯洋), who is dedicated to combating disinformation, and Taiwan Parks and Playgrounds for Children by Children chairwoman Ariel Chang (張雅琳).
The DPP hopes to gain support from civil groups and swing voters with its emphasis on social welfare issues, such as child protection and youth rights.
The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) list has former Kaohsiung mayor and its 2020 presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) at No. 1, followed by former legislator Ko Chih-en (柯志恩), who represented the party in last year’s Kaohsiung mayoral election, but lost.
Han, who has previously served as a lawmaker, was the first municipal mayor in Taiwan to be recalled from office after he launched a presidential bid shortly after being elected in Kaohsiung. Putting him atop the list demonstrates the KMT’s desire to appeal to China-leaning deep-blue voters.
Han has been criticized for his performance as a lawmaker, with critics saying his participation was sparse and attendance rate low. However, the KMT not only wants him to return to the role, but possibly have him elected as legislative speaker, as it typically puts forward its top legislator-at-large pick for the role.
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) put former Taipei deputy mayor Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) atop its list, followed by former New Power Party (NPP) legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) and surrogacy advocate Chen Chao-tzu (陳昭姿), who was once a core cadre of the pro-independence Taiwan Action Party Alliance.
The TPP’s choices indicate that it aims to snatch votes that might otherwise go to minor parties, regardless of voter ideology. It also shows that the TPP and its chairman and presidential candidate, former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), place cronyism over talent.
Some people have withdrawn from the party to protest Vivian Huang, Ko’s election campaign director, being the top pick and the TPP favoring people who have come from other parties rather than long-time members.
The legislator-at-large system should push parties to nominate people who would focus more on non-political agendas and social needs that might otherwise fall through the cracks of constituency elections. It is a pity that some parties value political power over public welfare.
Voters should make wise choices to assure that those who gain at-large seats are of benefit to society.
Moreover, smaller parties, such as the Green Party, the Taiwan Statebuilding Party and the NPP, which are the voice of underrepresented demographics, face a tremendous challenge to reach the 5 percent threshold.
Taiwanese should be aware that the system leans toward outcomes that might have a negative effect on the nation’s democracy.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS