Can Lai relax?
Some media firms and opposition politicians have disdainfully remarked that Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, can conduct his election campaign “lying flat.”
In other words, they think that with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) failing to agree on a joint ticket, the election has become something of a cakewalk for Lai.
The contemptuous statement suggests that Lai’s odds of winning depended on whether the alliance came together, disregarding Lai’s endeavors since campaigning began. It is as if, had the KMT and TPP come to an agreement, Lai would have had to work desperately on his campaign, but now that the talks have collapsed, Lai can win without breaking a sweat.
Lai has traveled throughout Taiwan and proposed policies to make the nation better, before naming former Taiwan representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) as his running mate.
He developed relationships with locals wherever he went, listened to them, offered help to undergraduates to reduce their tuition fees and spoke at many colleges, winning applause from students and the hearts of the younger generation.
After Hsiao became his running mate, Lai even made “developing Taiwan” a priority for the campaign, to bring a better future to the nation.
The DPP, the KMT and the TPP are running their respective campaigns, and Lai can expect attacks from the KMT’s presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). Lai must pull out all the stops to win over voters and avoid allowing the opposition parties to jeopardize Taiwan’s future.
How could anyone say that Lai winning the election would be a cakewalk?
Yeh Mei-hsia
Taipei
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant