The Ministry of Transportation and Communications on June 30 implemented regulations stipulating that drivers could be fined NT$6,000 if they do not yield to pedestrians. The new rules have been enforced effectively, and gradually, Taiwan is leaving behind the notorious reputation of being “a hell for pedestrians.”
However, rules should be reasonably implemented. Recently, in a dashcam video posted on YouTube, a driver passed through an intersection, while a pedestrian was crossing the street even though the light was red. Fortunately, although the driver, who had a green light, did not stop, the pedestrian was not hit. Nevertheless, the driver was reported and fined NT$6,000.
When drivers pass through intersections, sometimes pedestrians suddenly appear and run across the road. On such occasions, if no immediate action is taken to avoid a collision, should the drivers keep driving or slam on the brakes? Most people would keep driving.
Stopping a car abruptly might be even more dangerous, as it might lead to a multiple-vehicle pileup. Yet, when law enforcement receive reports of such incidents, the driver would still be fined NT$6,000. Of course, the driver could appeal the citation, and if that is rejected, they could file a lawsuit, but the process would be time-consuming and exhausting, and could cause the driver even more stress. The price they end up paying might be greater than their financial loss.
Drivers should abide by the law, but the bottom line is that they should obey the law and act morally. Most drivers and pedestrians are law-abiding citizens. In terms of enforcing the law, it should be carried out in conjunction with reason and compassion. The officials, drivers, pedestrians and those who report others, should act with empathy.
When pedestrians cross the road, they should refrain from using their cellphones and walk slightly faster than normal. They can nod to drivers who yield to them. This would be a friendly gesture that leads to positive vibes.
This is just like when two vehicles meet in a narrow alley. No rules have been specified which car should yield first, but both would work things out and neither would take the other’s courtesy for granted. Each driver would usually lightly honk their horn or flash their lights to indicate appreciation to the other driver. Such a small gesture is more than enough to show friendliness.
A NT$6,000 fine is far from small. Some of those who report others do so with questionable intentions, whereas some law enforcers apply traffic regulations unreasonably. The purpose of revising the traffic laws was never to create another hell for driver.
Taiwanese drivers already have to deal with a series of hazardous situations. During rush hour, a bus driver has to constantly dodge illegally parked vehicles, and if they accidentally cross the double yellow lines, it might be captured by someone’s dashcam and reported to police. When the bus finally reaches an intersection safely, it stops to wait for pedestrians to cross the road. This is the daily life for road users in Taiwan, and a hell for drivers and bus drivers.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS