The Ministry of Transportation and Communications on June 30 implemented regulations stipulating that drivers could be fined NT$6,000 if they do not yield to pedestrians. The new rules have been enforced effectively, and gradually, Taiwan is leaving behind the notorious reputation of being “a hell for pedestrians.”
However, rules should be reasonably implemented. Recently, in a dashcam video posted on YouTube, a driver passed through an intersection, while a pedestrian was crossing the street even though the light was red. Fortunately, although the driver, who had a green light, did not stop, the pedestrian was not hit. Nevertheless, the driver was reported and fined NT$6,000.
When drivers pass through intersections, sometimes pedestrians suddenly appear and run across the road. On such occasions, if no immediate action is taken to avoid a collision, should the drivers keep driving or slam on the brakes? Most people would keep driving.
Stopping a car abruptly might be even more dangerous, as it might lead to a multiple-vehicle pileup. Yet, when law enforcement receive reports of such incidents, the driver would still be fined NT$6,000. Of course, the driver could appeal the citation, and if that is rejected, they could file a lawsuit, but the process would be time-consuming and exhausting, and could cause the driver even more stress. The price they end up paying might be greater than their financial loss.
Drivers should abide by the law, but the bottom line is that they should obey the law and act morally. Most drivers and pedestrians are law-abiding citizens. In terms of enforcing the law, it should be carried out in conjunction with reason and compassion. The officials, drivers, pedestrians and those who report others, should act with empathy.
When pedestrians cross the road, they should refrain from using their cellphones and walk slightly faster than normal. They can nod to drivers who yield to them. This would be a friendly gesture that leads to positive vibes.
This is just like when two vehicles meet in a narrow alley. No rules have been specified which car should yield first, but both would work things out and neither would take the other’s courtesy for granted. Each driver would usually lightly honk their horn or flash their lights to indicate appreciation to the other driver. Such a small gesture is more than enough to show friendliness.
A NT$6,000 fine is far from small. Some of those who report others do so with questionable intentions, whereas some law enforcers apply traffic regulations unreasonably. The purpose of revising the traffic laws was never to create another hell for driver.
Taiwanese drivers already have to deal with a series of hazardous situations. During rush hour, a bus driver has to constantly dodge illegally parked vehicles, and if they accidentally cross the double yellow lines, it might be captured by someone’s dashcam and reported to police. When the bus finally reaches an intersection safely, it stops to wait for pedestrians to cross the road. This is the daily life for road users in Taiwan, and a hell for drivers and bus drivers.
Lin Cheng-wu is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS