When young people go clubbing, the use of cannabis and laughing gas (nitrous oxide) is quite common. Laughing gas in particular is almost everywhere. Cannabis, on the other hand, is a category 2 narcotic under the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act (毒品危害防制條例), and hence its use is a criminal offense. Laughing gas is listed as a controlled chemical substance; the use and possession of it would not contravene the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act.
As a result, many young people take it as a new favorite pastime and believe that its use would not lead to death, which is wrong.
Some unscrupulous entrepreneurs take advantage of this and advertise laughing gas by saying that its use would not incur any criminal charges. Recently, the police collaborated with Keelung customs officials and intercepted and seized 54 tonnes of laughing gas, the largest amount to date. The laughing gas was likely intended for illicit sale, officials said.
POPULARITY
Recently, laughing gas has grown more popular, yet it has always existed in a legal gray area.
However, the truth is that it could be as harmful as any narcotic. It is indeed confusing that laughing gas is not regulated under the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act.
The Ministry of Justice has offered an explanation and said that in terms of drug abuse and addiction, laughing gas is different from narcotics. Additionally, it has been widely used in the industrial, healthcare and food production sectors. In other words, laughing gas’ extensive use across society has prevented it from being listed as a narcotic.
However, there have been cases in which its misuse or excessive use has led to death. In Taiwan, the misuse of laughing gas would only be punished with a fine of a certain amount of money according to the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法).
LEGAL STATUS
In stark contrast to Taiwan’s lenient measures, the British government recently decided to ban the use of laughing gas once and for all, and its misuse would be more severely penalized. Those found in possession could be imprisoned for several years or handed unlimited fines. Those who provide or produce laughing gas might be sentenced up to 14 years in prison. As laughing gas is set to become an illegal class C substance in the UK by the end of the year, its possession might lead to two years’ imprisonment.
London’s action and determination should be applauded. After having reviewed recent social cases, actual situations on the streets and research reports from civil organizations, the British government decided to ban its use and sale to prevent more antisocial or criminal activities.
GOVERNMENT
It is hoped that the agencies and officials in Taiwan would pay more attention to the lethality of laughing gas.
The government should be more attentive, regulate and ban this “chemical substance.”
It must be emphasized that its misuse might lead to addiction and lifelong destruction, and this should be stopped.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS