When young people go clubbing, the use of cannabis and laughing gas (nitrous oxide) is quite common. Laughing gas in particular is almost everywhere. Cannabis, on the other hand, is a category 2 narcotic under the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act (毒品危害防制條例), and hence its use is a criminal offense. Laughing gas is listed as a controlled chemical substance; the use and possession of it would not contravene the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act.
As a result, many young people take it as a new favorite pastime and believe that its use would not lead to death, which is wrong.
Some unscrupulous entrepreneurs take advantage of this and advertise laughing gas by saying that its use would not incur any criminal charges. Recently, the police collaborated with Keelung customs officials and intercepted and seized 54 tonnes of laughing gas, the largest amount to date. The laughing gas was likely intended for illicit sale, officials said.
POPULARITY
Recently, laughing gas has grown more popular, yet it has always existed in a legal gray area.
However, the truth is that it could be as harmful as any narcotic. It is indeed confusing that laughing gas is not regulated under the Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act.
The Ministry of Justice has offered an explanation and said that in terms of drug abuse and addiction, laughing gas is different from narcotics. Additionally, it has been widely used in the industrial, healthcare and food production sectors. In other words, laughing gas’ extensive use across society has prevented it from being listed as a narcotic.
However, there have been cases in which its misuse or excessive use has led to death. In Taiwan, the misuse of laughing gas would only be punished with a fine of a certain amount of money according to the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法).
LEGAL STATUS
In stark contrast to Taiwan’s lenient measures, the British government recently decided to ban the use of laughing gas once and for all, and its misuse would be more severely penalized. Those found in possession could be imprisoned for several years or handed unlimited fines. Those who provide or produce laughing gas might be sentenced up to 14 years in prison. As laughing gas is set to become an illegal class C substance in the UK by the end of the year, its possession might lead to two years’ imprisonment.
London’s action and determination should be applauded. After having reviewed recent social cases, actual situations on the streets and research reports from civil organizations, the British government decided to ban its use and sale to prevent more antisocial or criminal activities.
GOVERNMENT
It is hoped that the agencies and officials in Taiwan would pay more attention to the lethality of laughing gas.
The government should be more attentive, regulate and ban this “chemical substance.”
It must be emphasized that its misuse might lead to addiction and lifelong destruction, and this should be stopped.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Emma Liu
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS