Manipulators use shootings
At about 10pm on Wednesday last week a firearm was fired several times in Beimen District (北門), Tainan. The shooting, in which no one was hurt, appears to have arisen from a dispute between rival solar power contractors. However, it comes at a sensitive time in the run-up to next year’s presidential and legislative elections. Consequently, people with ulterior motives are trying to use the incident to stir up public opinion. It looks very much like a repeat of the “88-bullets shooting” that took place in Tainan’s Syuejia District (學甲) on Nov. 10 last year. In both cases, certain interest groups have sought to make false but plausible accusations to influence people’s voting intentions.
The “88-bullets shooting,” which took place in Tainan shortly before last year’s local elections, sent a shockwave of public opinion across Taiwan, with commentators claiming that there had been a breakdown of law and order and a string of shootings under the governance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The result of the elections was the DPP was kicked out of office in many counties and cities, although the DPP’s Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) was narrowly re-elected as mayor of Tainan.
After the election, the “88-bullets shooting” case was solved, and the main instigator turned out to be Wang Wen-tsung (王文宗), who was one of the major “vote captains” of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in Tainan. This revelation showed that the pre-election hullabaloo was a case of a thief shouting “stop thief!”
Now there has been another shooting incident in the run-up to elections. The police have a fair idea about who was involved and have arrested a number of suspects. Nonetheless, influencers in the media and online forums have again been trying to stir up public opinion and rekindle last year’s anger to make political capital. Biased judgements by keyboard warriors pretending to be experts are the wrong approach, and this kind of kangaroo court flies in the face of fairness and justice.
Crime and safety indexes published by the Numbero global database rank Taiwan and its cities third-best in the world in terms of their low crime rate. This is in line with statistics published by the National Police Administration, which show that Taiwan’s crime rate has been falling for seven years in a row and 98.27 percent of cases are solved. These figures show that the rule of law is well established in Taiwan.
As a Tainan resident, I am keen to gain a deeper understanding, so I searched for more information regarding police activities. There were 48 shootings in six metropolitan cities last year, of which only six took place in Tainan. This shows that Tainan’s law-and-order situation does not adversely compare with other major cities. The tide of political opinion stirred up by the “88-bullets shooting” mostly accused the ruling DPP of corruption, tolerance of crime and collusion with vested interests. The occasional use of firearms in anger has led to certain cities being labeled “the city of bullets.”
Historically speaking, shootings that have taken place soon before elections have often been falsely attributed and used to manipulate public opinion. As regards last week’s shooting in Beimen, voters would be wise to adopt the three principles of rationality, pragmatism and science by seeking evidence with a scientific attitude, reviewing the available information and thinking rationally about what actually caused the incident. We can have faith that the police would reveal the truth of the matter.
Bu Mou
Tainan
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS