Only 9.3 percent of Taiwanese polled said that they consider China to be “trustworthy,” a survey released on Monday by Academia Sinica showed.
The survey, conducted by telephone from Sept. 14 to 19, asked respondents for their views on identity, China and the US. Most identified themselves as Taiwanese and said they do not trust China, but also that they do not trust the US, which a researcher said was based on concerns that Washington would not commit troops to defend Taiwan if China attacked.
However, the polling also showed that a majority supported US flybys and transits in the Taiwan Strait, and believed visits to Taiwan by high-level US officials helped to garner support in Washington for Taiwan’s defense.
Concerns that the US would not defend Taiwan are based on observations of the war in Ukraine, where the US has said it would not put boots on the ground, Soochow University Department of Sociology assistant professor Pan Hsin-hsin (潘欣欣) said.
Of course, that does not mean the US is not helping Ukraine in other ways. It sends equipment, conducts training and provides vital reconnaissance data, and its decision not to commit troops is out of concern that doing so would escalate the conflict globally.
However, compared with the potential fall of Ukraine, the stakes are higher for the US and its allies if Taiwan were to fall to China. Much has already been written about how Taiwan’s high-tech semiconductor chips are vital to the global economy and Taiwan is an important part of the US’ first island chain strategy. Chinese Communist Party control of Taiwan would directly endanger US interests in Japan, South Korea and the Philippines. It would also empower China to project its forces outward into the Pacific, where they would become a direct threat to US territories in the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa and Hawaii.
A Chinese takeover of Taiwan would also put China firmly in control of the Taiwan Strait and the Bashi Channel, which would disrupt commercial shipping through the region. China would have the means to stop container ships for random inspections and to put tariffs on shipping, which would increase delivery times and costs.
Given the economic and strategic importance of Taiwan, it is highly unlikely that the US would not commit troops to its defense. Retired US Army general Wesley Clark argued as much in an interview with CNN, saying that it was becoming “more and more clear that the United States will commit forces to defend Taiwan if China attacks.”
Clark also said that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) “has many problems other than Taiwan” that he needs to focus on, so there was no need to “overreact” to Chinese rhetoric on the issue.
Given mainstream opinion among Taiwanese, who have a general distrust of China and an aversion to identifying as “Chinese,” it is odd that the opposition candidates for January’s presidential election are so keen to espouse cross-strait peace agreements and economic cooperation.
The focus of all candidates should be on keeping China at arm’s length and encouraging Washington to formally commit to defending Taiwan. Such a commitment would go a long way toward improving trust of the US in Taiwan and the confidence of Taiwanese in the nation’s military, which has been the subject of scrutiny due to espionage and poor-quality training.
As the election draws near, candidates should carefully heed opinion polls in formulating their campaign platforms. They should focus on military reform, economic decoupling from China and greater military ties with the US. The longer these things are delayed, the less prepared Taiwan would be to resist Chinese aggression.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence