Washington’s unwavering support for Israel during its ground invasion of Gaza is coming under increasing scrutiny in the Global South.
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) this week hosted a delegation of foreign ministers from the Arab and Islamic world, including representatives from Saudi Arabia, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Egypt and Indonesia. Beijing said it is ready to work with these countries toward a ceasefire in Gaza, the release of hostages, the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid and an “early, comprehensive, just and enduring settlement of the Palestinian question.”
This is not a new line from Beijing, but it would no doubt be welcomed by some in the Muslim world, particularly in Southeast Asia, which is keen to see more global leadership on an issue that has stoked outrage across communities. Tensions have been running high since Oct. 7, when Hamas militants surged across the border and killed 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, and took as many as 240 hostage.
The region’s two largest Muslim majority countries — Indonesia and Malaysia — have long taken a strong pro-Palestinian stance and neither has diplomatic ties with Israel. As the civilian death toll in Gaza climbed above 13,000 following Israel’s military campaign, with images of dead and injured children flooding their timelines, tens of thousands of Indonesians and Malaysians have attended rallies and sermons in support of Palestinians.
The protest movement is spreading to all areas of public life in Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, where 87 percent of the 280 million strong population follow the faith. In a social media video message to his followers on Monday last week, Asrorun Niam Sholeh, chairman of the Fatwa Division at the Indonesian Ulema Council, the highest Muslim authority in the land, laid out the four principles behind an edict that urged the faithful to boycott Israeli products.
There have also been social media lists encouraging people to avoid well-known US brands such as McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, Starbucks and Coca-Cola. Those protesting say the double standards of the US in the Middle East are becoming increasingly apparent.
It is a similar picture in Malaysia. At a rally in Kuala Lumpur on Oct. 24, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim joined thousands of pro-Palestinian supporters to condemn what they are calling “barbaric” acts in Gaza. The country has refused to cut ties with Hamas, and Anwar has spoken to Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh to express “Malaysia’s unwavering support for the Palestinian people.” In parliament, the Malaysian prime minister said the US embassy had tried to pressure him to change his mind, but he refused.
“Popular opinion in Malaysia is causing leaders to speak out forcefully,” said Sidney Jones, the New York-based senior adviser to the Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict in Jakarta. “In Indonesia, there is no way that President Joko Widodo could have met with President Joe Biden recently and not said he had delivered a message about Gaza to the US.”
This has yet to cause a serious rift between the US and Indonesia — the two countries signed a comprehensive strategic partnership at that same meeting — although if Indonesians volunteering in hospitals in Gaza are killed, it could prompt more representations from Jakarta to Washington, she said.
The pressure is already rising. Indonesian Minister for Foreign Affairs Retno Marsudi, in a video message from the foreign ministers’ meeting in Beijing, “strongly condemned” what she said were Israeli tank attacks on the Indonesian hospital in Gaza on Monday, in which it is thought 12 civilians were killed.
Israel said the medical facility is used to disguise Hamas’ underground command and control center, a claim both the Indonesians and the Palestinians deny.
This is just one example of how the conflict is spilling over into Southeast Asia. Washington’s unquestioning support for Israel is contentious in the region, dean of Nanyang Technological University’s College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Joseph Liow (廖振揚) said. Much of this is a hangover from the aftermath of al-Qaeda’s attacks on the US on 9/11 — in particular the US-led invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan — that is still fresh in the minds of many Malaysians and Indonesians.
“That script is going to play out again, and that is going to create difficulties for the leaders of these countries,” he said.
Enter China, which has been quick to spot the opportunity to play global peacemaker, despite its many limitations. Beijing has been trying to position itself as a powerful player in the Middle East, after it helped broker a detente between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
The US has urged China to use its influence to prevent the conflict from spreading further, but President Xi Jinping (習近平) has yet to use the leverage he has with Russia and Iran to influence either the war in Ukraine or Gaza. Even now, as more nations in the Arab and Islamic world are turning to Beijing, it has little more to offer besides commitments to keep talking.
The Chinese are likely to continue their relationship-building with the Islamic world on the Palestinian issue, overtures that are likely to be welcomed, despite Beijing’s mass arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances against Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang. Human Rights Watch in 2021 concluded that these violations constituted “crimes against humanity.” Yet the focus for many Muslims in Asia is the fate of their fellow Muslims in the Middle East, not in Xinjiang.
Comments by Biden warning Israel about extremist violence against Palestinians in the West Bank might do little to win over those suspicious of US intentions. The question now is whether Beijing could bridge the gap between its diplomatic ambitions and its ability.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s