Washington’s unwavering support for Israel during its ground invasion of Gaza is coming under increasing scrutiny in the Global South.
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) this week hosted a delegation of foreign ministers from the Arab and Islamic world, including representatives from Saudi Arabia, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Egypt and Indonesia. Beijing said it is ready to work with these countries toward a ceasefire in Gaza, the release of hostages, the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid and an “early, comprehensive, just and enduring settlement of the Palestinian question.”
This is not a new line from Beijing, but it would no doubt be welcomed by some in the Muslim world, particularly in Southeast Asia, which is keen to see more global leadership on an issue that has stoked outrage across communities. Tensions have been running high since Oct. 7, when Hamas militants surged across the border and killed 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, and took as many as 240 hostage.
The region’s two largest Muslim majority countries — Indonesia and Malaysia — have long taken a strong pro-Palestinian stance and neither has diplomatic ties with Israel. As the civilian death toll in Gaza climbed above 13,000 following Israel’s military campaign, with images of dead and injured children flooding their timelines, tens of thousands of Indonesians and Malaysians have attended rallies and sermons in support of Palestinians.
The protest movement is spreading to all areas of public life in Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, where 87 percent of the 280 million strong population follow the faith. In a social media video message to his followers on Monday last week, Asrorun Niam Sholeh, chairman of the Fatwa Division at the Indonesian Ulema Council, the highest Muslim authority in the land, laid out the four principles behind an edict that urged the faithful to boycott Israeli products.
There have also been social media lists encouraging people to avoid well-known US brands such as McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, Starbucks and Coca-Cola. Those protesting say the double standards of the US in the Middle East are becoming increasingly apparent.
It is a similar picture in Malaysia. At a rally in Kuala Lumpur on Oct. 24, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim joined thousands of pro-Palestinian supporters to condemn what they are calling “barbaric” acts in Gaza. The country has refused to cut ties with Hamas, and Anwar has spoken to Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh to express “Malaysia’s unwavering support for the Palestinian people.” In parliament, the Malaysian prime minister said the US embassy had tried to pressure him to change his mind, but he refused.
“Popular opinion in Malaysia is causing leaders to speak out forcefully,” said Sidney Jones, the New York-based senior adviser to the Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict in Jakarta. “In Indonesia, there is no way that President Joko Widodo could have met with President Joe Biden recently and not said he had delivered a message about Gaza to the US.”
This has yet to cause a serious rift between the US and Indonesia — the two countries signed a comprehensive strategic partnership at that same meeting — although if Indonesians volunteering in hospitals in Gaza are killed, it could prompt more representations from Jakarta to Washington, she said.
The pressure is already rising. Indonesian Minister for Foreign Affairs Retno Marsudi, in a video message from the foreign ministers’ meeting in Beijing, “strongly condemned” what she said were Israeli tank attacks on the Indonesian hospital in Gaza on Monday, in which it is thought 12 civilians were killed.
Israel said the medical facility is used to disguise Hamas’ underground command and control center, a claim both the Indonesians and the Palestinians deny.
This is just one example of how the conflict is spilling over into Southeast Asia. Washington’s unquestioning support for Israel is contentious in the region, dean of Nanyang Technological University’s College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Joseph Liow (廖振揚) said. Much of this is a hangover from the aftermath of al-Qaeda’s attacks on the US on 9/11 — in particular the US-led invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan — that is still fresh in the minds of many Malaysians and Indonesians.
“That script is going to play out again, and that is going to create difficulties for the leaders of these countries,” he said.
Enter China, which has been quick to spot the opportunity to play global peacemaker, despite its many limitations. Beijing has been trying to position itself as a powerful player in the Middle East, after it helped broker a detente between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
The US has urged China to use its influence to prevent the conflict from spreading further, but President Xi Jinping (習近平) has yet to use the leverage he has with Russia and Iran to influence either the war in Ukraine or Gaza. Even now, as more nations in the Arab and Islamic world are turning to Beijing, it has little more to offer besides commitments to keep talking.
The Chinese are likely to continue their relationship-building with the Islamic world on the Palestinian issue, overtures that are likely to be welcomed, despite Beijing’s mass arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances against Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang. Human Rights Watch in 2021 concluded that these violations constituted “crimes against humanity.” Yet the focus for many Muslims in Asia is the fate of their fellow Muslims in the Middle East, not in Xinjiang.
Comments by Biden warning Israel about extremist violence against Palestinians in the West Bank might do little to win over those suspicious of US intentions. The question now is whether Beijing could bridge the gap between its diplomatic ambitions and its ability.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS