Taiwan has a very important decision to make in the upcoming presidential election. One party stands for protecting the integrity of Taiwanese self-rule, the other two main parties who stand a chance at winning both cater to China and, if elected, would risk locking Taiwan into a position of being annexed by China against the will of a vast majority of the population.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, and the KMT all need a history lesson. Taiwan was never ceded to the Republic of China (ROC). The only treaty regulating the status of Taiwan is the Treaty of San Francisco of 1951. It was ratified in 1952, before the Treaty of Taipei, and thus the Treaty of Taipei only concerns territory not covered in the Treaty of San Francisco. The ROC was tasked with the administration of Taiwan and other named islands, but not the sovereignty.
After Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his government fled to Taiwan, they established a government in exile. The KMT and others continue to argue the Cairo and Potsdam declarations as evidence that the act of ceding Taiwan should be interpreted as being ceded to the ROC. These declarations are not evidence to that end. Neither are they treaties.
They can be seen as declarations of intention and whether the intention was genuine or an attempt at appeasing an obstructionist and uncooperative Chiang matters little, as any intention along that path was immediately reversed once China invaded Korea.
Has Taiwan ever belonged to China? What is and what was China? Is British India the same as India after independence? Of course not, and neither is China. The Manchu empire, which among several other nations held some Taiwanese territory, was overthrown in 1911. By then it had ceded the territory it held on Taiwan to Japan.
China, whether it is the ROC or the People’s Republic of China (PRC), has no legitimate claim to Taiwan.
Something did change Taiwan. It was the transition to democracy. When Taiwanese were finally able to chose their own government through general elections, it bestowed legality upon the government. It is Taiwanese who decide their future and it is clear that they do not want to be made part of China.
January’s election might be the last time Taiwan has a choice.
With the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the KMT hogging attention for the past few months with their debate about which party should be on top in their marital bed, maybe the election can finally be about politics. Was it all about squandering time or is the intention of the TPP and the KMT to form some sort of alliance?
The 3 percent margin of error they are quibbling over in the polls to decide who should lead a proposed alliance ticket should have been easily resolved.
One possibility is that TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is buying time by evading pressure from the KMT and/or China to form a coalition.
The public display of tears could be a result of that pressure. It would make it more understandable, albeit non-transparent.
Either way it is politics with Chinese characteristics — foul and lacking any tangible logic.
As a large majority of Taiwanese do not want to be absorbed by China, how can part of that majority still vote for the very parties that would lead Taiwan into that abyss?
In some countries, parties like the KMT, which supervised the disappearance and murder of people it claimed to represent, have been banned.
Transparency should be the first requirement of any presidential candidate.
For Taiwanese who do not wish to be part of the PRC, yet vote for parties that support the so called “1992 consensus,” and who cannot or will not see what “one country, two systems” has done to Hong Kong, consider this: With a youth unemployment rate exceeding 20 percent in China, what kind of business opportunities do you expect from cross-strait trade?
If Ma’s KMT had been able to ratify the cross-strait service trade agreement, how would that have affected the Taiwanese job market, which has an overall unemployment rate of 3.5 percent and a youth unemployment rate of less than half that of China’s?
If Taiwan chooses to become part of China by electing a president and parties that could make it inevitable, the same exodus of foreign investment, business and talent that is occurring in China and Hong Kong will also happen in Taiwan.
Guard your freedom if it is valuable to you.
Jan Nilsson is a business manager in Singapore.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS