The meeting between US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) last week did not stray far from their respective policy structures, but there are a few points that deserve attention.
First, the January presidential election in Taiwan is not a choice between war and peace. Voice of America quoted one senior US official who said Xi denied that China was preparing to invade Taiwan in 2027 or 2035. Xi told Biden that there was no such plan, and that no one had ever spoken to him about such a plan. Such a statement is a slap in the face of those who keep claiming that the election is a choice between war and peace.
The only thing stopping Xi from pulling the trigger is military strength. Whether Xi will make a move against Taiwan lies in his assessment of the chances of success, not in who gets elected.
Even though some presidential candidates vow to bring “peace” if elected, all solutions other than annexation are regarded by China as “pro-independence” moves. As soon as Xi thinks he has a 100 percent chance of taking out Taiwan, he would not hesitate to launch a war. The only thing that Taiwan can do to keep China at bay is to keep ratcheting up its military power, so that Xi will not be misled into thinking he has a chance to win. “Peace through strength” says it all.
At the meeting, Xi said that China has no plans to surpass or supplant the US, a statement that has resurfaced once again. China has obviously changed its wrong notion of “the East is rising, the West is declining,” especially when its GDP growth rate has begun to fall below that of the US. Its per capita GDP in 2021 was only 75 percent of its rival’s and in the third quarter of this year slid to 64 percent, equivalent to the US’ in 2017.
What is worrisome is whether Taiwan would grow slack in its self-defense and in turn bolster China’s confidence in annexing it. If the presidential candidates who claim they would bring peace if elected, Taiwanese could grow naive enough to believe that peace is secured. Taiwan would be lured into complacency, shortening the period of compulsory military service and causing its defense capability to falter.
As soon as the government accepts the so-called “1992 consensus” of Taiwan being a part of China, cross strait issues would become a domestic problem in which the US or other allies have no right to interfere, which would put Taiwan on a plate for Xi.
Second, Xi urged the US to support unification, while Biden asked Xi to respect Taiwanese elections.
Before the Xi-Biden meeting, the Financial Times quoted an insider as saying that Xi wanted Biden to express opposition to Taiwanese independence instead of the usual stance of not supporting it, but added that Biden was not considering the move. Xi has proposed a new stance by wanting the US to “support peaceful unification.”
“Oppose” and “does not support” do not mean the same thing, yet Beijing and pro-China media outlets have intentionally confused the two.
The US has always maintained the same stance that Biden stated in 2021, that Taiwan should decide its future for itself. What the US insisted on is for the process to be peaceful, regardless of the result. This is why Biden was going out of his way to urge Xi to respect Taiwan’s elections.
Third, Xi wants the US to stop providing arms to Taiwan, while the US is adamant that it is obligated to help bolster Taiwan’s self-defense.
At the meeting, Xi strayed from the usual stance of “opposing US arms deals with Taiwan” to “stopping the US from arming Taiwan.” This is perhaps an echo of pro-China supporters who keep calling for the US to stop arming Taiwan to the teeth. The US has reiterated that based on the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), it is obligated to ensure that Taiwan has the ability to defend itself by providing it with the assistance it needs.
The US believes it is China that is trying to change the “status quo,” just as in October of last year US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said China has decided the “status quo” of Taiwan’s situation is no longer acceptable. China has decided on “coercion and making life difficult in a variety of ways on Taiwan in the hopes that that would speed reunification, but also holding out the possibility, if that didn’t work, of using force to achieve their goals” he said.
Unless China gives up on using force or halts its daily incursions and military harassment against Taiwan, the US has a duty to follow the articles in the TRA and help ratchet up Taiwan’s self defense.
Chen Shih-min is an associate professor in National Taiwan University’s political science department.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s