Former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) topped the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) list of legislator-at-large nominations for the Jan. 13 elections, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) listed Jing Chuan Child Safety Foundation CEO Lin Yue-chin (林月琴) in its first spot.
The legislator-at-large nominations showed that the focus of the KMT and DPP were different, and it is obvious which is better.
Despite having millions of “Han fans,” Han’s political career has revealed his desire for power, highlighted in his shenanigans to polarize and divide the electorate. In his astronomical rise in 2018, he rode a wave of impractical expectations and the delusions that certain extremely enthusiastic Taiwanese have of politicians.
The KMT listed Han atop its legislator-at-large list to appeal to the former Kaohsiung mayor’s support base, hoping they would bring some of their infectious enthusiasm to the party. In other words, the KMT cares more about divisiveness and polarization than it values contributions to society or image, showing how the KMT places cronyism over talent.
By contrast, although Lin has no political experience or throngs of fawning fans, she has spent her time working on child and youth protection and social welfare, caring for the most vulnerable groups.
Putting her in the top spot of its legislator-at-large list means that the DPP appreciates her hard work and hopes she could keep working on the issues in the Legislative Yuan.
The top candidates from the two parties possess different qualities, indicating different political values and prospects for Taiwan. Political parties should not keep talking about the people and the nation without doing anything. Instead, they should consider public welfare a priority and change radical advocates’ thinking, to promote social harmony and cooperation.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS