With election campaigns under way, presidential candidates of the opposition parties have turned to support the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, once called the question of reactivating the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant rhetorical, saying that “no solution for nuclear waste means no nuclear power.” Now he says that he would not phase out nuclear power.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) used to find fault with the the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant policy. Now he says that nuclear power should be considered necessary.
In 1980, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project was launched in Yenliao (鹽寮) in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). Construction proceeded intermittingly, but in 2014, it came to a halt. The Control Yuan investigated and censured the project several times. The Atomic Energy Council also handed fines to those involved in the construction. Today, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project is unfinished, with numerous safety issues still plaguing the site.
On Dec. 31, 2020, the construction permit for the plant expired. As specified by Article 5 and Article 30 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法), construction cannot resume without a permit. Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) thus filed an application, which was approved by the Nuclear Safety Commission, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the New Taipei City Government and Gongliao District Office. It was decided that the construction would be halted, and the surrounding area would no longer be restricted as a low-density residential zone.
Yet the area has had its designation changed as a nuclear power facility. This is not in line with Article 26 in the Urban Planning Act (都市計畫法), which specifies that modification is needed once the land development is changed. Additionally, Article 49 of the Land Expropriation Act (土地徵收條例) requires that the expropriation of land be revoked once it is no longer reserved for public facilities.
When construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant was halted in 2014, the total installed power capacity in Taiwan was 48,819MW. This September, the capacity reached 63,483MW — an increase of 14,664MW — much more than the capacity that would have been generated by the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (270MW). Today, Taiwan’s renewable energy installations have a 16,966MW capacity, a huge increase compared with before (3,836MW).
In 2014, the annual electricity production was 2,599GWh (gigawatt-hours). Last year, the number increased to 2,881GWh. Clearly, it is unnecessary to be fixated on the controversial Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
The construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has already been blocked through referendums five times. Nevertheless, with or without the Referendum Act (公民投票法), politicians are still obsessed with this unsafe nuclear power plant.
Referendum Act Article 30 and Article 32 say that the result of a referendum is legally binding for two years. If the ruling party is determined to abolish the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project, it must modify the land usage as soon as possible and revoke the expropriation of the land. The ruling party should also plan the transition of the land to rid the public of the four-decade-long Fourth Nuclear Power Plant dispute. That way, Taiwan could achieve a transition to sustainable energy much faster.
Tsai Ya-ying is an attorney for the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS