Known as a gaffe machine, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has added another verbal blunder to his track record at a youth forum. Speaking on the issue of drug problems, Ko said that people who dropped out of junior-high school are 99 times more likely to become drug users than those who went on to pursue higher education.
He went on to say that helping disadvantaged groups in society is not taking pity or doing charity for them, but “protecting” oneself because if these people are not supervised properly, they would become “rapists or murderers in one or two decades.”
This is only the tip of the iceberg of Ko’s gaffes, so the absurdity of the remarks do not come as much of a shock. However, as a presidential candidate, people should be more critical and push back against Ko’s condescending and elitist mindset instead of growing indifferent to it.
For young people who just finished junior-high school, their household environment, family finances and where they live play a huge role in determining whether they would continue to pursue higher education. Some might need to help out the family by getting a part-time job. Others might prefer becoming apprentices. For example, the renowned philanthropic vendor Chen Shu-chu (陳樹菊), who sold vegetables at the Central Market in Taitung and was honored as one of the 100 most influential figures by Time magazine in 2010 for donating more than NT$10 million (US$312,402, based on the current foreign exchange rate) to charitable causes, only holds a elementary school degree. Other examples include Minister of Digital Affairs Audrey Tang (唐鳳), who never finished junior-high school.
As such, it is extremely unfair to say that these young people did not pursue studies because of delinquency, crime or drugs. A person’s education background has no direct relation to one’s accomplishments in life.
Whatever supervisory plans Ko has in mind for these minorities, whether its daily visits or police monitoring, they would only reinforce stereotypes and social stigma, without improving their situation or security. As a nation still haunted by elitism and authoritarianism, treating them as the Other is downright bigotry. The last thing a national leader should do is to discriminate or label them, or even exercise public power to control them.
A responsible national leader would introduce new measures or career paths to help minorities and disadvantaged groups complete basic education, instead of promising to round these people up like criminals.
A future leader should think about methods to improve social networks and how to guide minorities into vocational schools or reinstatement.
The establishment of a basic education and social network is to provide a fundamental safety net, so that those less fortunate, such as those born into poverty, or who face domestic violence at home, do not become a victim of circumstances outside of their control.
Even though the government has introduced the 12-year basic education curriculum for nearly a decade, the minorities that Ko was referring to demonstrate that despite this system, there are still students who fall through the cracks
Unfortunately, as a presidential candidate, Ko has only shown his unsuitability as a president and strong bias against people that he considers “low-end.”
Rather than winning the public over with solid policies, his ignorant gaffes and authoritation character has only reassured them that he is not the right candidate for the top job.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence