Known as a gaffe machine, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has added another verbal blunder to his track record at a youth forum. Speaking on the issue of drug problems, Ko said that people who dropped out of junior-high school are 99 times more likely to become drug users than those who went on to pursue higher education.
He went on to say that helping disadvantaged groups in society is not taking pity or doing charity for them, but “protecting” oneself because if these people are not supervised properly, they would become “rapists or murderers in one or two decades.”
This is only the tip of the iceberg of Ko’s gaffes, so the absurdity of the remarks do not come as much of a shock. However, as a presidential candidate, people should be more critical and push back against Ko’s condescending and elitist mindset instead of growing indifferent to it.
For young people who just finished junior-high school, their household environment, family finances and where they live play a huge role in determining whether they would continue to pursue higher education. Some might need to help out the family by getting a part-time job. Others might prefer becoming apprentices. For example, the renowned philanthropic vendor Chen Shu-chu (陳樹菊), who sold vegetables at the Central Market in Taitung and was honored as one of the 100 most influential figures by Time magazine in 2010 for donating more than NT$10 million (US$312,402, based on the current foreign exchange rate) to charitable causes, only holds a elementary school degree. Other examples include Minister of Digital Affairs Audrey Tang (唐鳳), who never finished junior-high school.
As such, it is extremely unfair to say that these young people did not pursue studies because of delinquency, crime or drugs. A person’s education background has no direct relation to one’s accomplishments in life.
Whatever supervisory plans Ko has in mind for these minorities, whether its daily visits or police monitoring, they would only reinforce stereotypes and social stigma, without improving their situation or security. As a nation still haunted by elitism and authoritarianism, treating them as the Other is downright bigotry. The last thing a national leader should do is to discriminate or label them, or even exercise public power to control them.
A responsible national leader would introduce new measures or career paths to help minorities and disadvantaged groups complete basic education, instead of promising to round these people up like criminals.
A future leader should think about methods to improve social networks and how to guide minorities into vocational schools or reinstatement.
The establishment of a basic education and social network is to provide a fundamental safety net, so that those less fortunate, such as those born into poverty, or who face domestic violence at home, do not become a victim of circumstances outside of their control.
Even though the government has introduced the 12-year basic education curriculum for nearly a decade, the minorities that Ko was referring to demonstrate that despite this system, there are still students who fall through the cracks
Unfortunately, as a presidential candidate, Ko has only shown his unsuitability as a president and strong bias against people that he considers “low-end.”
Rather than winning the public over with solid policies, his ignorant gaffes and authoritation character has only reassured them that he is not the right candidate for the top job.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
RSS