Nervous Democrats have been on an emotional roller coaster lately. In just the last week, there have been polls showing US President Joe Biden decisively behind in a rematch with former US president Donald Trump (bad news), triumphs in various state elections (good news) and Senator Joe Manchin’s announcement that he will not run for re-election (ymmv).
Add it all up, however, and there is a clear message: Biden is in trouble, and he will not be able to get out of it without upsetting parts of the Democratic coalition.
It is certainly true that last week’s election results in Kentucky, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey — consistent with Democrats’ unusually strong midterm performance last year — are positive developments for Biden’s party. However, it is a mistake to treat them as refuting the polls. For starters, pre-election polling suggested Democrats would win all these races. If the wins came despite pessimistic polls, that might be evidence that Biden’s low ratings are driven by polling error as well, but that is not the case.
There are signs of bad news for Biden in the results. In Virginia, even though Democrats secured majorities in both houses of the legislature, Republican candidates handily outperformed Trump’s benchmarks. In Kentucky, incumbent Governor Andy Beshear ran dramatically ahead of Biden. That is quite an achievement for Beshear and perhaps a sign of how Democrats could improve their performance in other red states, but the whole premise of Beshear’s candidacy was that he was different from Biden and the national Democratic brand.
In Ohio, abortion-rights activists won a tremendous victory for their cause. There is no doubt that abortion rights are a strong issue for Democrats almost everywhere outside of the deep south, but that same poll that sent Democrats into a tailspin last week also shows Biden is already the preferred candidate on this issue. It is not that voters are unaware of the difference between Biden and Trump, or that they like Trump’s position. It is that they care less about abortion rights than they do about issues — notably crime, immigration, the economy and national security — on which Trump has an advantage.
The reality is that Biden is currently on track to win a smaller share of the vote than he did in 2020. That is good enough to still win in a place like Virginia, but it is not sufficient to retain the White House.
The Biden campaign is clearly aware of this, as evidenced by its decision to invest in an early advertising blitz, but campaigns are not won by advertising alone. Especially in presidential elections, “earned” media coverage on the news is more important than what people see in ads. What voters have seen and read about is a president who responded to a better-than-expected midterm showing by eschewing the post-midterm triangulation that most successful presidents execute.
Polling released by a new group, Blueprint 2024, funded by LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman, reveals some of the cost of this approach: Voters do not see Trump as any more ideologically extreme than Biden, and they are often unfamiliar with Biden’s more moderate policy achievements.
For example, the polling documents that 84 percent of US voters have heard about Biden’s student loan forgiveness initiatives — a borderline policy that is supported by just 52 percent of the public. By contrast, 83 percent of voters support the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provision that caps out-of-pocket Medicare prescription drug spending at US$2,000 a year, but only 49 percent of voters have heard about it. That is in part a Republican messaging success — or rather, a non-messaging success, as they voted unanimously against the IRA, but tend not to talk about this provision — but it also reflects choices by Democrats about what to emphasize. Blueprint finds that only 48 percent of voters know that oil and gas production has increased to record levels under Biden, for instance, and only 46 percent know that the deficit has fallen under Biden, or that Biden has boosted funding to police departments.
The administration does not like to talk about these topics because they divide Biden’s coalition. He even made the unusual decision to pivot left after winning the primary, forming a unity task force with US Senator Bernie Sanders and shifting a few policy positions in the direction of his defeated rival.
Disunity can, of course, be costly. The risk that embittered progressives could throw the election to Trump, while unlikely, cannot be dismissed altogether, but the risk of ceding the center ground is real — whether to Trump or to someone like Joe Manchin, who is inevitably being mentioned as a possible presidential candidate and who progressives demonize, despite his clear value to the party.
Biden can minimize this risk with a shift, not so much in policy substance, but in emphasis — on deficit reduction, for example, or on reducing bureaucracy. At a minimum, his campaign should focus less on selling the Biden record to the progressive base and more on publicizing his more moderate policy achievements. If that provokes some dissension from the left, that might not be all bad either, as conflict drives coverage and awareness.
When you are on track to lose, you need to take some calculated risks to try to win. And notwithstanding last week’s election results, that is exactly where Biden finds himself.
Matthew Yglesias is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. A cofounder of and former columnist for Vox, he writes the Slow Boring blog and newsletter. He is author of One Billion Americans. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant
RSS