On June 30, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications revised the temporary parking rules, implementing a system of penalty points and cracking down on stopping at red lines.
As the ministry prepares to create more yellow parking line and stopping zones, it is to be lenient with enforcement of penalty points, but drivers are still to be fined if they stop at red lines, even to pick up passengers or unload cargo.
However, the Vision Zero Alliance and professional drivers have expressed discontent.
My daughter was fined recently. She was not happy. Usually, it takes less than 30 seconds and does not disrupt traffic when drivers pick up a passenger, but now they face the risk of a fine simply for stopping at a red line — and most of the lines are red at the moment.
For many, fines under these circumstances are unreasonable. The new rules must be re-examined.
Have you ever stopped at a red line to allow a passenger to get out? Have you hailed a taxi at a red line? Are the regulations reasonable?
It is wrong to break the law, but in urban areas, it is almost impossible to abide by the traffic rules all the time.
In a radius of a few hundred meters around my house, there are few spaces for parking, which are almost always occupied, while yellow lines are also in short supply. Otherwise, its red lines.
Are the long red lines needed at intersections? If the rules are obeyed, getting into a car or hailing a taxi becomes nearly impossible.
More often than not, convenience stores, rehabilitation centers and long-term care centers are surrounded by red lines, meaning delivery trucks and vehicles carrying passengers in wheelchairs have to stop at them.
Some people take great pleasure in reporting traffic offenses. If they watch a red line zone in such an area for a short time, they would see many drivers breaking the rules.
Moreover, professional drivers who are reported might lose their job.
The ministry has received many complaints from drivers of taxis, buses and cargo trucks who have been repeatedly fined and given points for temporary parking in zones with red lines, which has hurt their incomes.
Taiwan is a densely populated nation where many people rely on automobiles. Drivers need to park temporarily — red lines notwithstanding — to complete their tasks. If they lose their job because of a traffic rule, is it in line with the principle of proportionality regarding road safety?
Drivers who illegally occupy road space are annoying, but sometimes, drivers need to stop temporarily. If the result is a penalty, the law is neither reasonable nor fair.
The ministry has asked local governments to create more yellow line areas and stopping zones, while the penalty point system is likely to be implemented next year, but does that mean parking spaces will be reduced? Is it going to become even more difficult to park legally?
Perhaps the red lines at intersections could be shortened and other areas be made yellow instead of red.
Or perhaps the ministry should revise the rules, allowing drivers to stop at red lines for a short time, if there is obvious need and traffic is not impeded.
That way, elderly people and other passengers with mobility issues would also be able to access vehicles more easily.
The ministry should also disregard public reporting of temporary parking, as fines do not improve traffic flow, but only lead to further annoyance.
Chang Yen-ming is a former Water Resources Agency section head.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS