Born intersex and raised as a boy, Polina has known for years that she wanted to live as a woman, but Russia’s sweeping curbs on gender-affirming healthcare have made that much more difficult.
The 33-year-old from Moscow said that since a new law — which targets transgender people — was passed in July, doctors had been wary about prescribing her female sex hormones and other gender-affirming treatment for fear they could lose their licenses or face prosecution.
“The law likens any treatment, even if justified and vitally necessary, to wrongdoing,” Polina told reporters in a message chat, asking for her surname to be withheld for privacy reasons.
Intersex people are born with atypical chromosomes or sex characteristics, meaning they cannot be easily categorized as either male or female.
Many undergo surgery as infants to bring the appearance and function of their genitalia into line with that expected of males or females, a practice that has been banned in many European countries, but remains legal in Russia.
The new law, which bans legally or medically changing gender, does allow people described as having “congenital anomalies” to undergo medical interventions and then change legal gender, but intersex rights advocates say it is vaguely worded and poorly understood by doctors.
“The bill doesn’t list the intersex variations that would allow for a person’s documents to be changed,” said Ilia Savelev, a codirector and legal adviser at ARSI, a group that supports intersex people in Russian-speaking countries.
Despite the new legislation, Polina was able to change her legal gender on her identity documents to female late last month, but campaigners said they feared other intersex people could be wrongly denied that right.
“Many may not be able to change their documents if their sex variation is not deemed appropriate grounds for it,” said Alin, another codirector of ARSI and founder of nfp.plus, a Web site publishing information about intersex issues.
The Russian Ministry of Health did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment.
SURGERIES
Intersex rights advocates are also concerned that the legislation explicitly sanctions medical interventions to “correct” the sex of intersex people.
“Previously, there was simply no ban on such practices; now, there’s explicit permission,” Savelev said, adding that the law has “sent Russia back years” on intersex rights and put it at odds with a European shift to ban “sex-normalizing” surgeries.
In 2015, Malta became the first country to ban medically unnecessary surgeries carried out on intersex children without their consent. Other EU countries have followed suit or proposed similar bans.
Eva-Lilit Tsvetkova, a Russian endocrinologist who specializes in caring for trans and intersex patients, called instead for a policy of “normalizing” intersex bodies.
Tsvetkova said that while there was occasional need for “corrective” surgeries on intersex babies — for example, where their anatomy made urination difficult — many are medically unnecessary and can lead to long-term complications, including post-traumatic stress disorder and incontinence.
“A large subset of these operations are ‘cosmetic,’” she said. “There’s never been a medical body of evidence for why they’re needed, just a hypothesis by doctors that if a child’s genitals look ‘non standard,’ this may impact their well-being.”
Others said they were concerned that intersex people had been mentioned in the legislation at all, saying the law’s distinction between them and trans people appeared a crude attempt to justify anti-trans measures.
“Intersex people’s needs [for gender-affirming treatment] are presented as having a biological basis, while those of transgender people are seen as simply whims,” Savelev said.
RIGHTS THREAT
The gender change law was the latest step in a widespread crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights, which Russian President Vladimir Putin seeks to portray as evidence of moral decay in Western countries.
Last year, he signed a law expanding Russia’s restrictions on the promotion of what it calls “LGBT propaganda” and in June, the ministry said that Russian clinics would soon be staffed with sexologists to help patients “overcome” homosexuality and various sexual “mental disorders.”
Besides their concern about the impact of the gender law passed in July, the crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights has unsettled intersex rights campaigners in Russia.
Anton, an intersex activist based in Moscow who asked not to use his full name, voiced concern that Western rights groups often conflate LGBTQ+ and intersex issues in their advocacy.
Intersex and LGBTQ+ campaigning should be kept separate to protect children from an increased risk of unnecessary “corrective” surgeries in socially conservative countries, Anton said.
“If, in Russia or a conservative Muslim country, the parents of an intersex child see information saying their child is LGBT, it could do them a world of harm,” he said.
Openly is an LGBTQ+ news Web site from the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters: www.openlynews.com
The Paris Olympics are over and the five-ringed views of the Louvre, Invalides, Eiffel and Versailles just memories. As a diplomatic historian, my thoughts naturally turn to France! The Olympian of world affairs, the creators of “diplomacy,” Cardinal Richelieu and Prince Talleyrand. But sixty years ago, at the 1964 diplomatic games, Team China bested Team France in a battle of wits in “free-style negotiations” over Taiwan. Paris never recovered. To be fair, in Europe of 1963-1964, France was besieged. She had been ousted from her Asian dominions. She had begun her first nuclear weapons tests just as the United States and
Having the title doctor or the letters PhD after your name carries the connotation of having broad knowledge. In reality, while people with doctoral degrees often possess highly specialized expertise and might be held in high esteem among their peers, they are likely virtually unknown to the general public. In Taiwan, people with doctorates are common, while probably fewer than one out of 100 of them could truly make a name for themselves. Of course, there are exceptions. Those who gain media exposure can easily become well-known, especially if they are involved in politics. However, many fail to live up to
For the past few weeks, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) have been embroiled in a series of scandals related to irregularities in their presidential campaign financial reporting. These scandals continue to expand as more evidence surfaces, raising more questions about the party’s financial propriety and competency. These irregularities include unusually high spending, allegedly accepting donations from abroad, reporting 97.3 percent of personal donations as “cash,” making large payments to marketing firms with close ties to the party and accounting errors. When the financial irregularities were first reported, the party blamed it on “arbitrary misconduct” by
Over the past few years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a visible change in the EU’s approach to Taiwan. I call this phenomenon European hype about Taiwan. The change is noticeable at both the EU and member-state levels, with parliaments and Central Europe leading the way. The best example is the fact that Taiwan is finally mentioned in various EU documents (a real novelty compared with the past 30 years), in addition to statements by European politicians, an increase in bilateral contacts, a growing awareness of Taiwan’s importance and its contribution not only to European prosperity, but