Golden Horse undiminished
The Taipei Golden Horse Film Festival officially opened on Nov. 9. Before that, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), unveiled his five major cultural policies, pledging to “polish the Golden Horse” again, while simultaneously blaming the government for the China’sagainst the Golden Horse Awards, because of its cross-strait policy, as the scope of the awards has narrowed in recent years.
The reason for China’s boycott of the Golden Horse Awards is that during the awards ceremony in November 2018, director Fu Yue (傅榆), who won Best Documentary that year, said in her acceptance speech onstage: “I hope that our country can be regarded as a truly independent entity, and this is my greatest wish as a Taiwanese.”
In Taiwan, the winners of the Golden Horse Awards enjoy freedom of speech and are allowed to say whatever they want, but unexpectedly, this triggered the sensitive nerves of the narrow-minded Chinese authorities, and some Chinese filmmakers simply walked out of the ceremony. China has not participated in the Taiwanese event since then.
As for this year’s Golden Horse Awards, the five nominees for Best Narrative Feature include: Time Still Turns the Pages (年少日記) from Hong Kong, Snow in Midsummer (五月雪) from Malaysia, and Stonewalling (石門) from Japan. Meanwhile, members of the jury include Singaporean director Anthony Chen (陳哲藝), Hong Kong songwriter Chris Shum (岑偉宗) and many more filmmakers.
With such a lineup, international participation is particularly broad. Has the scope really narrowed that much since 2018? Despite the absence of Chinese filmmakers, the Golden Horse Awards are still glittering as they enter their 60th year.
Wang Shan
Taipei
Lessons from 3D knives
As videos about 3D-printed “radish knives” (蘿蔔刀) on TikTok go viral in China, the popularity of such toy knives has spread to elementary schools in Taiwan.
Surprisingly, an Internet celebrity joked in one of the videos: “If you see someone you do not like, just stab him.” This Internet celebrity was completely irresponsible and failed to take into account the consequences of his actions. That was unbelievable.
There are two sides to every story. As a tool, a toy knife is essentially a piece of stationery, if used properly. If not, it might become a weapon. We can allow students to use a toy knife, but we must explain the rules of use correctly, so they know how to use it with caution. It not only cultivates a sense of responsibility, but is also a good teaching moment.
From a psychological point of view, the more forbidden something is, the more desirable it becomes. This is what we might call the “forbidden fruit effect.”
If students try to use the toy knives in secret, if they were to hurt each other accidentally, they will not dare to tell the adults and would delay getting treatment, which would only make the situation worse.
Instead of banning the toy knives, students should be actively guided to think and discuss why they want to use the knives and what the alternatives are. Through a series of reflective questions, children can have a sense of awareness and use the toy knives responsibly.
Lin Yen-yu
Kaohsiung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS