Golden Horse undiminished
The Taipei Golden Horse Film Festival officially opened on Nov. 9. Before that, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), unveiled his five major cultural policies, pledging to “polish the Golden Horse” again, while simultaneously blaming the government for the China’sagainst the Golden Horse Awards, because of its cross-strait policy, as the scope of the awards has narrowed in recent years.
The reason for China’s boycott of the Golden Horse Awards is that during the awards ceremony in November 2018, director Fu Yue (傅榆), who won Best Documentary that year, said in her acceptance speech onstage: “I hope that our country can be regarded as a truly independent entity, and this is my greatest wish as a Taiwanese.”
In Taiwan, the winners of the Golden Horse Awards enjoy freedom of speech and are allowed to say whatever they want, but unexpectedly, this triggered the sensitive nerves of the narrow-minded Chinese authorities, and some Chinese filmmakers simply walked out of the ceremony. China has not participated in the Taiwanese event since then.
As for this year’s Golden Horse Awards, the five nominees for Best Narrative Feature include: Time Still Turns the Pages (年少日記) from Hong Kong, Snow in Midsummer (五月雪) from Malaysia, and Stonewalling (石門) from Japan. Meanwhile, members of the jury include Singaporean director Anthony Chen (陳哲藝), Hong Kong songwriter Chris Shum (岑偉宗) and many more filmmakers.
With such a lineup, international participation is particularly broad. Has the scope really narrowed that much since 2018? Despite the absence of Chinese filmmakers, the Golden Horse Awards are still glittering as they enter their 60th year.
Wang Shan
Taipei
Lessons from 3D knives
As videos about 3D-printed “radish knives” (蘿蔔刀) on TikTok go viral in China, the popularity of such toy knives has spread to elementary schools in Taiwan.
Surprisingly, an Internet celebrity joked in one of the videos: “If you see someone you do not like, just stab him.” This Internet celebrity was completely irresponsible and failed to take into account the consequences of his actions. That was unbelievable.
There are two sides to every story. As a tool, a toy knife is essentially a piece of stationery, if used properly. If not, it might become a weapon. We can allow students to use a toy knife, but we must explain the rules of use correctly, so they know how to use it with caution. It not only cultivates a sense of responsibility, but is also a good teaching moment.
From a psychological point of view, the more forbidden something is, the more desirable it becomes. This is what we might call the “forbidden fruit effect.”
If students try to use the toy knives in secret, if they were to hurt each other accidentally, they will not dare to tell the adults and would delay getting treatment, which would only make the situation worse.
Instead of banning the toy knives, students should be actively guided to think and discuss why they want to use the knives and what the alternatives are. Through a series of reflective questions, children can have a sense of awareness and use the toy knives responsibly.
Lin Yen-yu
Kaohsiung
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS