There has been an unwritten rule during the past decade of climate diplomacy: Good things could happen when the world’s two biggest economies are aligned. If the US and China could again come together in the quest to slash greenhouse gas emissions, there is hope that progress could be made at the COP28 summit in Dubai.
To lay the groundwork for the summit, which starts later this month, the two countries’ top climate negotiators met last week in Rancho Mirage, California. Five days of talks, originally set to last just four, concluded on Wednesday without yielding an immediate public breakthrough, although the US touted “common ground on a number of issues” and China said there were “positive results.”
The window for success is shrinking and the bilateral relationship faces new challenges, even as US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepare to meet on the sidelines of the APEC summit in San Francisco this week. The upcoming US presidential election is set to stoke political rhetoric targeting Beijing, and Biden might face scrutiny on the campaign trail for any moves seen as being soft on China, narrowing the lane for dealmaking. China’s sputtering economy and anxiety about energy security have also limited its room to maneuver on climate policy. The upcoming presidential election in Taiwan is another wild card for volatile relations between Washington and Beijing.
Illustration: Yusha
“Historically, climate change was the one area where we were always able to find some common ground,” Georgetown University international policy expert Joanna Lewis said. “More recently, the broader tensions of the relationship have spilled over into the US and China’s ability to do substantive engagement, even on the climate issue.”
Their progress now depends greatly on two veteran negotiators: US climate envoy John Kerry and his Chinese counterpart, former Chinese environment minister Xie Zhenhua (解振華). Both men have had significant influence over their countries’ climate policies, and their camaraderie might be hard for any successors to duplicate. Xie was a major architect of Xi’s 2060 net zero carbon emissions pledge, although he has in recent years had to navigate calls within China’s bureaucracy for more restrained green measures as the nation grapples with economic and energy security concerns. Kerry is a former US secretary of state who has unusual access to Biden after decades serving together in the Senate.
Together, Xie and Kerry hammered out a joint statement in 2014 that had set the stage for the landmark Paris Agreement a year later. Their promise to collaborate in the final days of COP26 talks in Glasgow provided the momentum, and even some of the language, that helped produce the summit’s final pact.
The Dubai meeting might be one of the last times the two sit across from each other. Kerry is set to mark his 80th birthday at the UN summit. Xie, who will have just turned 74, suffered a stroke earlier this year that sidelined some face-to-face talks. The Chinese government is preparing to appoint Liu Zhenmin (劉振民), a top-level diplomat, to replace Xie after COP28, according to people familiar with the plan, who asked not to be identified as the matter is private.
Kerry and Xie have had more than 50 meetings since early 2021, although they have worked as diplomats together for far longer, having had conversations over seafood in Boston and duck in Beijing, as well as during impromptu meetings in airports around the world. Kerry said in July that the two have a “special relationship” marked by “great respect for each other” — and recent encounters have been marked with exchanges about each other’s health and well-being. Even last year, when Beijing suspended formal climate negotiations with the US after then-House speaker Nancy Pelosi made a visit to Taiwan, the two kept talking. “Kerry and I have [had] a friendship for 25 years” and have continued private conversations, Xie told reporters at the climate summit in Egypt last year.
The diplomats’ close ties are credited as one reason Xie was effectively pulled out of retirement in 2021, following Kerry’s appointment in Washington.
China and the US have good reasons to find consensus. The world is set to heat up beyond the 1.5°C goal set in Paris unless the two nations most responsible for today’s planet-warming pollution take aggressive action. Protecting the environment is popular within China and one of the few ways it could earn goodwill from countries that feel threatened by its rising economic power. For the US, China is a critical intermediary to the climate-vulnerable nations that are a potent negotiating bloc at the annual COP talks.
Despite those incentives, Xie and Kerry are navigating around “political land mines,” the Asia Society Policy Institute’s incoming China Climate Hub director Li Shuo (李碩) said. “The bilateral relationship is limiting the political space on each side, and that makes both countries drive hard bargains.”
US and Chinese negotiators want a package deal to emerge from COP28, according to people familiar with their discussions who asked not to be named as the talks are private. When talks in Beijing this summer ended without a pronouncement, Kerry stressed that he and Xie did not want to rush out a weak declaration for appearance’s sake. Instead, he said, they were striving for something meaningful. Xie said in late September that he and Kerry have been holding biweekly videoconferences, and the two men huddled together for days of talks in California earlier this week. Although the session did not yield an immediate public declaration, it helped build the foundation for possible future pronouncements.
It would be a major achievement if both countries committed to boosting the share of their total power production that comes from clean energy, negotiators say. Another potential breakthrough would be some type of coordination to channel money to poorer nations so they might transition more quickly to green energy or help identify projects for investment that these countries could afford, they said.
Kerry has also encouraged China to publish a plan for slashing methane pollution. The country promised to develop an action plan in 2021, but its release was delayed amid internal resistance from its agriculture and energy ministries, which are worried about the impact on coal mines and rice fields. The blueprint unveiled on Tuesday last week lays out broad goals around better controlling methane releases, but does not cite specific reduction targets for the potent greenhouse gas.
While the omission was a disappointment to some climate activists, the move was still seen as a gesture of goodwill from Beijing. It also lays the groundwork for China to include methane in its next emissions-cutting pledge under the Paris Agreement, the World Resources Institute’s international climate initiative director David Waskow said. China’s existing greenhouse gas reduction pledge does not include methane — effectively ignoring 20 percent of the country’s emissions.
Chinese officials and experts have also recently reiterated publicly that developed nations must deliver on promises to cut emissions and provide more finance before making demands on others.
While China is keen to emphasize its record-setting installation of solar and wind power, there is growing angst among US officials about China’s decision to permit 106GW of coal power capacity — roughly equivalent to bringing two power plants online each week. As China’s emissions continue to rise, the US’ are declining. Washington enacted a sweeping climate law last year that devotes hundreds of billions of US dollars to clean energy projects and it is clamping down on methane releases from the oil industry. Beijing, meanwhile, chafes at trade controls that it says target green energy gear needed to accelerate the transition, including US tariffs on solar panels first imposed in 2011 and restrictions on imported goods tied to alleged forced labor.
“These trade tensions and market tensions are always a factor,” research group E3G senior associate Alden Meyer said. “The US is not going to make a concession on trade to get something on climate, just like it won’t make a concession on Taiwan or human rights or the South China Sea.”
The two superpowers are on opposite sides of weighty issues that are to be front and center at COP28 — including which nations should contribute to a fund to compensate global warming victims and whether to expand the pool of wealthy donor nations for climate finance. In UN climate deliberations, China’s official classification as a developing country has limited its formal financial contributions, but the US and the EU want it to provide more.
Climate-vulnerable nations are pressing diplomats at COP28 to commit to phasing out all fossil fuels, although the proposal faces long odds with the war in Ukraine stoking energy concerns globally and the oil-rich United Arab Emirates hosting the summit. The US had a similar campaign at COP27 in Egypt, although the push was ultimately unsuccessful. Xie said at a September conference in Beijing that fossil fuels are essential to maintaining grid stability and that completely abandoning the energy source is “unrealistic.”
Nations also are starting to put together their emissions reduction plans for 2035 required under the Paris deal. It would be the first pledge from China since it promised in 2020 to peak carbon pollution by the end of the decade. Wang Yi (王毅), an ecological economist who was a member of China’s COP27 team, has pushed back on expectations for stronger targets, saying there should be a more “holistic and pragmatic” approach. “The goal-oriented or number-driven process should be changed, and more should consider the transformation led by practical actions and solutions,” he said.
Still, there are other, more discrete opportunities for bilateral progress, including promises to share best practices on stifling methane emissions from livestock and preserving grid reliability while integrating renewable power. They might not be headline-grabbing pronouncements, Waskow said, but they would be meaningful steps forward. “We could really pursue transformation on so many fronts — and some of that is nuts and bolts.”
China’s foreign ministry said in a statement that it hopes “the US will work with China in the same direction and create favorable conditions.” The US State Department did not respond to a request for comment.
As nations prepare their strategies for the talks in Dubai, any signal from the US or China would hold outsize sway. “They are the two biggest emitters, the two most powerful economies, the geopolitical rivals,” E3G’s Meyer said. “If they can broker an agreement, it makes it a lot easier for the rest of the system to move.”
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
RSS