Inflation continues to take a large bite out of workers’ wages. According to the latest government statistics released on Friday, the average regular monthly wages were NT$45,427 (US$1,404) in the first nine months of this year — an annual rise of 2.5 percent. Including overtime pay, performance-based rewards, perks and bonuses, the average total wages were NT$60,186 per month over the first nine months — an increase of 1.57 percent from the same period last year.
Yet once inflation is considered — with consumer prices rising 2.36 percent year-on-year in the first nine months, the picture is not so pretty. Real regular wages rose just 0.14 percent from a year ago during the first nine months, while real total wages fell by 0.78 percent over the same period and marked the first contraction for the period in seven years. The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) placed the blame on persistent inflation and other factors, such as lower bonuses amid an economic slowdown.
Data compiled by the DGBAS showed that the gains in nominal wages had continued to fail to match the rises in consumer prices as of September this year, and the increasing cost of living has had the greatest impact on lower-income earners and their families, as they tend to spend most of their disposable income on essential goods and services, which generally experience greater price increases than non-essential items.
It remains to be seen whether the negative real wage growth is likely to ease off in the final quarter of this year. This is because there has been no sign of significant trend changes for nominal wage growth and inflation in the short term, given that exports last month continued to register an annual decline and weighed on wage growth, while the inflation rate was still above 3 percent last month, casting a shadow on consumers’ spending power.
The good news is that overtime hours in the manufacturing sector, which is closely related to the nation’s economic climate, had increased for three consecutive months as of September, thanks to a low base of comparison last year, DGBAS data showed. Nevertheless, it requires further observation if the sequential increases in overtime hours are positive signs of a recovery in the export-oriented manufacturing sector.
In addition, the uneven development of different industries in the economy is also a key factor behind the decline in real wages in Taiwan. The fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic and US-China trade tensions have seen Taiwan’s industrial development become increasingly M-shaped, with income distribution worsening faster than expected. For instance, wages in industries such as shipping, semiconductors, information, communications and technology have increased markedly in recent years, outranking most firms in the service sector like hoteliers and restaurants, as well as several non-tech manufacturers such as machinery and chemicals.
An M-shaped development in local industries has enabled high-tech firms to easily attract talent with high salaries, while companies in the non-tech and service-focused industries face a disadvantage in attracting new blood, as they cannot afford to offer higher paychecks.
The government has worked hard to increase wages, implementing pay raises for public-sector workers in the hope of encouraging the private sector to follow suit. However, it must also work hard to curb inflation to safeguard people’s purchasing power, and to spare no effort to unwind the M-shaped industrial landscape. This would include introducing high-tech applications into non-tech and service firms, deregulating the service sector and providing more incentives for firms to upgrade their services. Only in this way could we create more high-paying jobs and facilitate overall wage increases.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of