Ukraine-born Taiwanese entertainer Larisa Bakurova obtained her national ID card and became a “new Taiwanese resident” in 2019. After marrying a Taiwanese and founding the Rising Star Rhythmic Gymnastics Association in 2020, she has dedicated her time to tutoring local gymnasts.
In July, she led young gymnasts to participate in international competitions in Turkey and Spain, bagging 19 gold, 7 silver and 2 bronze medals.
Bakurova was reportedly being considered by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for a legislator-at-large seat, but according to the Nationality Act (國籍法), new residents have to undergo the naturalization process for more than 10 years to be eligible for running for legislator.
As Bakurova received her Alien Permanent Resident Certificate in 2013, acquired Taiwanese citizenship at the end of 2016 and forfeited Ukrainian citizenship and obtained a national ID card in 2019, it is a pity that by next year, she would not be eligible to stand for legislator.
XU CHUNYING
Xu Chunying (徐春鶯), a Chinese national married to a Taiwanese, who Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) claims he has never met, has reportedly been considered for the party’s list of legislator-at-large nominees.
She has resided in Taiwan since 1993, started a family here more than 30 years ago and has also assumed the chair of the Taiwan New Residents’ Development Association.
Yet Xu claims that since the two sides of the Taiwan Strait do not have a “state-to-state” relationship, she does not have to forfeit her Chinese citizenship. She even retorted with the remark that people should not assume that all Chinese spouses are communist spies.
It is hard to imagine how much more unruly she would become if elected legislator.
If the two sides of the Strait do not have a de facto state-to-state relationship, Xu need not be a legislator of the Republic of China (ROC). As Taiwan is having its presidential election next year, there would have been no need for it if Taiwan is not considered a “state.”
If a Chinese spouse truly identifies with Taiwan with her words and actions, then she would be a new Taiwanese citizen, and no one would think of her as a Chinese communist spy. Xu’s statement sounds a lot like Ko, who has a proclivity for political mudslinging.
‘STATE-TO-STATE’
In 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) defined the island’s relations with China as “special state-to-state relations.” In August, when discussing the cross-strait relationship, Ko said that “special” can be kept, but urged people to refrain from saying “state-to-state” relations.
Is Ko running for president of the Republic of China or special governor of Taiwan province?
TWO IDEOLOGIES
Forfeiting her Ukrainian citizenship to become a new Taiwanese resident, Bakurova has worked hard to develop Taiwan’s rhythmic gymnastics. Xu, in her haughtiness and unruliness, is a new Taiwanese resident who does not identify with Taiwan and has only been acting as a Chinese mouthpiece.
The DPP and TPP’s respective consideration of Bakurova and Xu as legislator-at-large candidates reveal the two parties’ contrasting ideologies and attitudes towards China. It is the perfect opportunity to see which party is the one truly defending Taiwan’s interests, and in this case, it is the DPP, without question.
Lin Han is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Rita Wang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
RSS