For the first time in my adult life I cannot watch — or read — the news. Its presentation profoundly upsets me. I have not read, heard or watched the news from Israel/Palestine for over a week. I am afraid doing this has made me feel better. I have asked around and many other people are doing the same.
I would normally consider it shocking to not know what is going on elsewhere in the world. We owe it to common humanity not to ignore inhumanity, wherever it occurs. We should listen and at least sympathize, even if to no concrete purpose. The obligation on journalists is more specific; it is to supply the requisite information, which could be unpleasant to collect and convey. I have visited war zones and found it harrowing. Unspeakable horrors are occurring somewhere on Earth all the time. The media might only have space for just so much. When did you last hear about Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo — or even Ukraine? Yet the effort must be made, not dodged.
Now we have the most intensive, 24/7 coverage of extreme violence that I could recall. The evening news coyly says that scenes are “too awful to show” and then that “viewers may find some scenes distressing,” as if to draw us from whatever else we are doing. This is tabloid television, offering a ghoulish gloss on what news ought to be about, which is facts and their informed interpretation. Yet it is assumed that we cannot handle this, and instead we are given endless vox pops with people on the ground. We need something to stir the emotions. In this respect, television is in a different league from radio and the printed press.
Horror fuels a dangerous instinct: that of blame. Since every vox pop from Gaza must be preceded or followed by one from Israel, viewers are drawn into arguments fueled by heat and not light. There is no history or background. Tearful victims get more time than decisionmakers or experts. After the blame comes the overwhelming sense of impotence. What can we do? Should we shout, march, write or shut up? Mostly, we feel sad and return to our lives, pretending nothing has changed. Or at least most of us do.
Psychologists tell us how to cope with bad news when it affects us personally. They advise us to analyze it, assess the risk, seek a way forward and take action. Yet that is when it is personal and we have some agency over events. The evils of the outside world are in a different mental sphere. We cannot do anything directly about them and must remain spectators of other people’s agony. During the COVID-19 pandemic, addictions to “doomsurfing” and “doomscrolling” soared. People obsessively monitored news of the pandemic by the hour. This led to sensations of fear, sadness and anger, and an increase in cases of depression and trauma. As with bad news generally, its appeal was said to be an evolutionary response to potential danger — humans crave a warning.
There must be a limit. It is one thing to be occasionally reminded of the suffering of others and of our own impotence when it comes to changing the world around us. I cannot see that relentless real-time depictions of horror is instilling any virtue. We — and our children — are expected to witness screaming, bleeding, angry people, night after night. This cannot increase public understanding of what is happening, only add to anger, discord and mental distress. I want to watch the news; what is being shown is something different.
Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS