Not since Henry Kissinger in 1974 has a US secretary of state shuttled as frenetically around the Middle East as Antony Blinken does these days.
Here, in no particular order, is a partial list of Blinken’s stops in the region since Hamas went on its sadistic rampage on Oct. 7: Tel Aviv (multiple times), Cairo, Amman, Ankara, Doha, Manama, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh, Ramallah and Baghdad.
Yet whereas Kissinger’s month-long “shuttle diplomacy” (the phrase was coined for him) following the Yom Kippur War disentangled Israel from its Arab enemies and projected the sway of the American superpower during the Cold War, Blinken’s peregrinations are sending a different message. It is one of US foreign policy as a performative and feckless exercise in awkward photo ops — diplomatic kabuki without noticeable results.
Illustration: Mountain People
Neither Blinken nor his boss, US President Joe Biden, could wholly and fairly be blamed for this poor showing. Kissinger had the benefit of intermediating between Israel and its enemies in Syria and Egypt, whereas Blinken could talk to Israel and third parties, but not directly with Hamas.
Yet Biden and Blinken — who are as devoted to Israel’s security as any US leader in the 75 years since Israel’s founding — keep looking ineffectual. Their overarching objective is to prevent the conflict from spreading in the region or even sparking a great-power war. The immediate goal, however, has been to demonstrate support for Israel while simultaneously restraining the Israelis from causing a humanitarian disaster in the Gaza Strip.
Yet that catastrophe is now unfolding and worsening by the day: The body count in Gaza already exceeds 10,000. This is why Blinken has been pleading for Israel to take “humanitarian pauses.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has simply ignored these demands, dropping tunnel-busting bombs on Gaza and hitting Hamas fighters and civilians alike. There is to be no ceasefire until Hamas releases all hostages, Netanyahu said this week — at most “tactical, little pauses, an hour here, an hour there.”
An hour here or there, maybe, at some point, to evacuate entire cities? Netanyahu is not only snubbing the US but also making it look hypocritical to much of the world, from neighboring powers to protesters in the West — including those in front of the White House this weekend — and the so-called “Global South.” Is the US, by siding with Israel without restraining it, not applying a different humanitarian standard in Gaza from the one it exhorts the world to defend in Ukraine?
Even if this mess seems to prove the US’s hypocrisy, though, what it really shows is that Washington is either unable or unwilling to apply diplomatic levers to Israel. That might sound odd, since the US has, cumulatively since World War II, sent more aid to Israel than to any other country, and this month offered another big dollop. Washington also has Tel Aviv’s back in the UN Security Council and in world politics generally. How could Netanyahu jeopardize that kind of relationship?
Yet still he does — and started doing so long before Oct. 7. For much of this year, he and his extremist coalition partners have been trying to neuter Israel’s judicial branch and rule of law, and burying whatever remained of the American and Arab vision of a two-state solution for the Palestinian conflict. While the Biden administration was trying to broker peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia, “Bibi” Netanyahu was busy peopling swathes of the West Bank with Jewish settlers.
In return, Biden punished Netanyahu by... not inviting him to the White House. That was all. Netanyahu knew what he was doing. A year out from the US presidential and general election, the Republicans cannot wait to pounce on Biden for going wobbly on Israel. As it is, Biden now faces the political dilemma of losing not only the Zionist right but also young, left-leaning and pro-Arab voters — not to mention the Global South which he’s been trying to woo away from China (and Russia) in the larger geopolitical rivalry of our time.
The reality, a month after the Hamas attack, is that US foreign policy risks becoming collateral damage in the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Biden and Blinken are proving themselves unwilling to impose, when necessary, costs or consequences on one ally — Israel — while trying to support but also manage and restrain other friends, such as Ukraine against Russia, Taiwan against China or South Korea against North Korea. This year’s version of American shuttle diplomacy, unlike the 1974 original, might end in global tragedy.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering US diplomacy, national security and geopolitics. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for the Economist. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS