When presenting his energy platform on Wednesday last week, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) mentioned that during his time as Taipei mayor, he rejected a NT$1 billion food (US$31 million) waste treatment plant project, saying that he never had food waste when eating, and he wanted to train Taipei residents to not leave food waste.
This matter provides three insights into Ko.
First, he was meant to propose an energy policy, but did not do his homework on biomass energy and complacently exposed his ignorance on the issue. Taichung Waipu Green Energy Ecological Park — the first biomass power plant in Taiwan that has been operating since July 2019 — can process more than 50,000 tonnes of food waste each year and generate approximately 6 million to 8.8 million kilowatt hours of electricity.
Second, based on his own limited knowledge (he could not tell the difference between leftovers and kitchen waste), he vetoed a decision making process that should have been approached from a professional perspective (such as investment benefit analysis, alternatives, etc.). This also reflects Ko’s tendency to simplify complex things.
Third, it reveals Ko’s patronizing mindset of “I know better than others.” Ko’s narcissistic character is reminiscent of another political figure, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). After Taiwan’s presidential election in January 2016, China’s China Review News Agency commented that Ma was “narcissistic, selfish, suspicious and unkind. Ma should bear the most responsibility for losing the election.”
A poll conducted by a pro-blue TV station on May 13, 2016, just before Ma stepped down, showed that the approval rate of Ma’s eight-year administration was only 23 percent, which was actually the highest during Ma’s second term. At its lowest, his approval rating dropped to as low as 11 percent. Another TV station’s poll had it as low as 9.2 percent, which led to the ridiculing of Ma as “Mr Nine Percent.”
This narcissistic defeated general still feels good about himself today and frequently tries to “instruct” the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and even the people in Taiwan.
Ko is no better than Ma. As early as the first anniversary of his inauguration as Taipei mayor, Ko’s KMT rival, Sean Lien (連勝文), a KMT vice chairman, said that Ko was “extraordinarily narcissistic.” Ko responded at the time that “narcissism is not easy to change, but it is not very serious,” followed by, in trademark Ko style: “This is not narcissism, it is self-confidence. It is true that Ko can be overconfident sometimes.”
Many of Ko’s supporters “expect a rule-breaker,” and Ko is that person. Indeed, Ko will bring about change, but what is more important is what it will be changed into. The change (breaking the rules) might not necessarily be an improvement — it might also be a change for the worse. The narcissistic Ko has given the answer after eight years as Taipei mayor. Do we really need to bet our future on the narcissistic Ko again — this time, the future of the entire country?
Wu Hai-ruei is a manager of a listed company.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS