When presenting his energy platform on Wednesday last week, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) mentioned that during his time as Taipei mayor, he rejected a NT$1 billion food (US$31 million) waste treatment plant project, saying that he never had food waste when eating, and he wanted to train Taipei residents to not leave food waste.
This matter provides three insights into Ko.
First, he was meant to propose an energy policy, but did not do his homework on biomass energy and complacently exposed his ignorance on the issue. Taichung Waipu Green Energy Ecological Park — the first biomass power plant in Taiwan that has been operating since July 2019 — can process more than 50,000 tonnes of food waste each year and generate approximately 6 million to 8.8 million kilowatt hours of electricity.
Second, based on his own limited knowledge (he could not tell the difference between leftovers and kitchen waste), he vetoed a decision making process that should have been approached from a professional perspective (such as investment benefit analysis, alternatives, etc.). This also reflects Ko’s tendency to simplify complex things.
Third, it reveals Ko’s patronizing mindset of “I know better than others.” Ko’s narcissistic character is reminiscent of another political figure, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). After Taiwan’s presidential election in January 2016, China’s China Review News Agency commented that Ma was “narcissistic, selfish, suspicious and unkind. Ma should bear the most responsibility for losing the election.”
A poll conducted by a pro-blue TV station on May 13, 2016, just before Ma stepped down, showed that the approval rate of Ma’s eight-year administration was only 23 percent, which was actually the highest during Ma’s second term. At its lowest, his approval rating dropped to as low as 11 percent. Another TV station’s poll had it as low as 9.2 percent, which led to the ridiculing of Ma as “Mr Nine Percent.”
This narcissistic defeated general still feels good about himself today and frequently tries to “instruct” the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and even the people in Taiwan.
Ko is no better than Ma. As early as the first anniversary of his inauguration as Taipei mayor, Ko’s KMT rival, Sean Lien (連勝文), a KMT vice chairman, said that Ko was “extraordinarily narcissistic.” Ko responded at the time that “narcissism is not easy to change, but it is not very serious,” followed by, in trademark Ko style: “This is not narcissism, it is self-confidence. It is true that Ko can be overconfident sometimes.”
Many of Ko’s supporters “expect a rule-breaker,” and Ko is that person. Indeed, Ko will bring about change, but what is more important is what it will be changed into. The change (breaking the rules) might not necessarily be an improvement — it might also be a change for the worse. The narcissistic Ko has given the answer after eight years as Taipei mayor. Do we really need to bet our future on the narcissistic Ko again — this time, the future of the entire country?
Wu Hai-ruei is a manager of a listed company.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS