The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses all sorts of innovative techniques to spy on officials of foreign countries. It is well known that Chinese spies are everywhere. Now, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) wants to have Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) on the party’s list of legislator-at-large nominees. Xu is a Chinese immigrant and an advocate for foreign-born spouses. It is alleged that Xu was a CCP cadre. Generally speaking, every Chinese citizen’s duty is to collect intelligence and information for their home country.
Even though Xu claims that she is not a CCP member and even if she has given up her Chinese citizenship, when she goes back to China, the CCP is sure to contact her and give her tasks. Xu’s family is still in China. Xu’s ideology and national identity would require her to collect information for the CCP while expanding China’s organizations in Taiwan. Would the Legislative Yuan be able to monitor such behavior?
According to the laws on cross-strait relations, Taiwan and China do not recognize each other as sovereign countries. However, both sides acknowledge one another’s jurisdiction, using “mainland” and “Taiwan region” as references. Therefore, when a Chinese from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) marries a Taiwanese, they become a citizen of the Republic of China (ROC), without having to renounce their original PRC citizenship.
The problem is that under the Constitution, the PRC is not a sovereign country; rather, the PRC is unrealistically and absurdly described as an “enemy-occupied area.” In this sense, citizens of the PRC are also considered the people of the ROC.
Xu has been doing “united front” work for China. When she participated in the 19th National Congress of the CCP, she made remarks showing her support for the unification of China and Taiwan. These are her true colors. Even though she has renounced her PRC citizenship, it is unclear whether she has become a true Taiwanese.
We do not know if she could keep national secrets should she become a legislator. We cannot be sure if she would stop doing “united front” work for China. We must ask Xu: If she were elected as a legislator, how would she deal with China’s Anti-Secession Law?
China has been trying to annex Taiwan, which makes China a hostile country. Ko said that as long as Xu is not engaged with foreign affairs, everything would be fine. Is that so?
All kinds of policies in Taiwan are related to China. The Ministry of the Interior holds documents and information about Taiwan’s land administration and household registration. Other agencies such as the Coast Guard Administration, the Mainland Affairs Council and the National Immigration Agency also have much to do with China. Should Xu become a legislator, she would be able to check every document as she sees fit, including all sorts of confidential information about trade and vaccines.
According to Ko, if a person like Xu, who holds a Taiwanese ID card, is deprived of their political rights by having their right to stand as a legislator denied, Taiwan cannot be considered a country run according to the rule of law. However, it is only natural to prioritize a state’s national security. To prevent all traces of enemy infiltration, we must restrict a Chinese married to a Taiwanese from entering the Legislative Yuan.
During World War II, the US, a democratic country, put all Japanese-American citizens into internment camps. Given that the US was at war with Japan, all Japanese-Americans were under surveillance and supervised collectively by US officials.
Today, the situation in the Taiwan Strait is close to a defense readiness condition. Chinese citizens should never be allowed into the Legislative Yuan.
Chu Meng-hsiang is former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS