The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses all sorts of innovative techniques to spy on officials of foreign countries. It is well known that Chinese spies are everywhere. Now, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) wants to have Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) on the party’s list of legislator-at-large nominees. Xu is a Chinese immigrant and an advocate for foreign-born spouses. It is alleged that Xu was a CCP cadre. Generally speaking, every Chinese citizen’s duty is to collect intelligence and information for their home country.
Even though Xu claims that she is not a CCP member and even if she has given up her Chinese citizenship, when she goes back to China, the CCP is sure to contact her and give her tasks. Xu’s family is still in China. Xu’s ideology and national identity would require her to collect information for the CCP while expanding China’s organizations in Taiwan. Would the Legislative Yuan be able to monitor such behavior?
According to the laws on cross-strait relations, Taiwan and China do not recognize each other as sovereign countries. However, both sides acknowledge one another’s jurisdiction, using “mainland” and “Taiwan region” as references. Therefore, when a Chinese from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) marries a Taiwanese, they become a citizen of the Republic of China (ROC), without having to renounce their original PRC citizenship.
The problem is that under the Constitution, the PRC is not a sovereign country; rather, the PRC is unrealistically and absurdly described as an “enemy-occupied area.” In this sense, citizens of the PRC are also considered the people of the ROC.
Xu has been doing “united front” work for China. When she participated in the 19th National Congress of the CCP, she made remarks showing her support for the unification of China and Taiwan. These are her true colors. Even though she has renounced her PRC citizenship, it is unclear whether she has become a true Taiwanese.
We do not know if she could keep national secrets should she become a legislator. We cannot be sure if she would stop doing “united front” work for China. We must ask Xu: If she were elected as a legislator, how would she deal with China’s Anti-Secession Law?
China has been trying to annex Taiwan, which makes China a hostile country. Ko said that as long as Xu is not engaged with foreign affairs, everything would be fine. Is that so?
All kinds of policies in Taiwan are related to China. The Ministry of the Interior holds documents and information about Taiwan’s land administration and household registration. Other agencies such as the Coast Guard Administration, the Mainland Affairs Council and the National Immigration Agency also have much to do with China. Should Xu become a legislator, she would be able to check every document as she sees fit, including all sorts of confidential information about trade and vaccines.
According to Ko, if a person like Xu, who holds a Taiwanese ID card, is deprived of their political rights by having their right to stand as a legislator denied, Taiwan cannot be considered a country run according to the rule of law. However, it is only natural to prioritize a state’s national security. To prevent all traces of enemy infiltration, we must restrict a Chinese married to a Taiwanese from entering the Legislative Yuan.
During World War II, the US, a democratic country, put all Japanese-American citizens into internment camps. Given that the US was at war with Japan, all Japanese-Americans were under surveillance and supervised collectively by US officials.
Today, the situation in the Taiwan Strait is close to a defense readiness condition. Chinese citizens should never be allowed into the Legislative Yuan.
Chu Meng-hsiang is former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Emma Liu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS