The leaders’ declaration that emerged from September’s G20 summit in New Delhi highlighted the urgent need for collective action on climate change and sustainable finance. Central to the group’s Green Development Pact is the recognition that the energy transition must be cost-effective to accelerate progress. To reach this tipping point in affordability, we must remove the barriers — such as insufficient and expensive energy storage — currently preventing the growth of renewables.
To be sure, there is a lot of ground to cover. According to the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook 2022, the energy sector needs to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. There is also the question of funding. As part of the declaration, G20 leaders reaffirmed the commitment made by developed countries to mobilize US$100 billion per year in climate finance to support the developing world’s mitigation and adaptation efforts.
In a speech before the summit, European Council President Charles Michel said that this goal would be met for the first time this year. While this represents a significant step forward, it falls far short of the US$4.5 trillion in annual clean-energy investments required by 2030 to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
A massive shift in our approach to climate finance is clearly necessary. Multilateral development banks and philanthropies should play a vital role in facilitating affordable financing and mitigating risk to encourage private-sector investment, as well as establishing low-cost funds to ease the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. The goal is not only to decrease dramatically the price of clean-energy technologies, but also to lower the costs for research and development, facilitate reaching mass-market scale and develop financial linkages.
However, progress on affordability requires a concerted effort from all quarters. By collaborating to drive down the costs of renewables, we can ignite demand, stimulate innovation and trigger a market transformation that paves the way to a more sustainable and resilient future for us all.
Much depends on solving the problem of energy storage. Solar and wind power will almost certainly account for most renewable-electricity generation, owing to their affordability and widespread availability. However, these sources are abundant only some of the time: Countries around the equator receive about 12 hours of sunlight each day, while wind is inconsistent. Battery energy storage systems (BESS) are emerging as a potential solution to this inherent variability, especially as they approach a critical cost-efficiency threshold.
The Global Leadership Council, which was established by the Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet (of which I am chairman), has made BESS one of its signature initiatives. At the upcoming UN Climate Change Conference (COP28) in Dubai, the council is to launch the BESS Consortium, a multistakeholder partnership of leading development-finance institutions that would support the deployment of first-wave BESS projects across developing countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. The aim is to mobilize 5 gigawatts of BESS by the end of next year, secure more than US$4 billion in grant, concessional and commercial finance and, by 2030, unlock 90 gigawatts of BESS to enable 400 gigawatts of renewable energy.
India, in particular, has huge potential for BESS, given its plan to increase renewable-energy capacity to 600 gigawatts (65 percent of total installed capacity) by 2032. To achieve this ambitious goal, distribution companies must be able to procure and accommodate large volumes of renewables in a sustainable manner. At the distribution end, BESS can provide grid balancing, ramping support and other critical services to reduce the total cost of power procurement.
In New Delhi, a 40-megawatt-hours BESS project aims to build a scalable pathway for 1 gigawatt of storage by 2026, creating 10,000 jobs. The pilot project, when scaled up, could advance the technology and encourage more widespread renewable use. This would enhance the stability and dependability of the power grid, allowing for greater integration of clean-energy sources. Eventually, the project could cut carbon dioxide emissions and ensure a cost-effective and reliable supply of renewables.
These technologies have immense potential to promote economic diversification, strengthen energy security and foster job opportunities. Collaborating to advance them and establish a global landscape where sustainable energy underpins prosperity was the focus of last week’s Energy Transition Dialogues in India.
The race to make renewables affordable offers an unparalleled opportunity to generate sustainable and inclusive growth while reducing carbon emissions. However, we can get there only if the private sector, governments and civil society act together to lower the price of — and increase access to — clean tech.
Ravi Venkatesan is chairman of the Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS