The leaders’ declaration that emerged from September’s G20 summit in New Delhi highlighted the urgent need for collective action on climate change and sustainable finance. Central to the group’s Green Development Pact is the recognition that the energy transition must be cost-effective to accelerate progress. To reach this tipping point in affordability, we must remove the barriers — such as insufficient and expensive energy storage — currently preventing the growth of renewables.
To be sure, there is a lot of ground to cover. According to the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook 2022, the energy sector needs to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. There is also the question of funding. As part of the declaration, G20 leaders reaffirmed the commitment made by developed countries to mobilize US$100 billion per year in climate finance to support the developing world’s mitigation and adaptation efforts.
In a speech before the summit, European Council President Charles Michel said that this goal would be met for the first time this year. While this represents a significant step forward, it falls far short of the US$4.5 trillion in annual clean-energy investments required by 2030 to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
A massive shift in our approach to climate finance is clearly necessary. Multilateral development banks and philanthropies should play a vital role in facilitating affordable financing and mitigating risk to encourage private-sector investment, as well as establishing low-cost funds to ease the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. The goal is not only to decrease dramatically the price of clean-energy technologies, but also to lower the costs for research and development, facilitate reaching mass-market scale and develop financial linkages.
However, progress on affordability requires a concerted effort from all quarters. By collaborating to drive down the costs of renewables, we can ignite demand, stimulate innovation and trigger a market transformation that paves the way to a more sustainable and resilient future for us all.
Much depends on solving the problem of energy storage. Solar and wind power will almost certainly account for most renewable-electricity generation, owing to their affordability and widespread availability. However, these sources are abundant only some of the time: Countries around the equator receive about 12 hours of sunlight each day, while wind is inconsistent. Battery energy storage systems (BESS) are emerging as a potential solution to this inherent variability, especially as they approach a critical cost-efficiency threshold.
The Global Leadership Council, which was established by the Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet (of which I am chairman), has made BESS one of its signature initiatives. At the upcoming UN Climate Change Conference (COP28) in Dubai, the council is to launch the BESS Consortium, a multistakeholder partnership of leading development-finance institutions that would support the deployment of first-wave BESS projects across developing countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. The aim is to mobilize 5 gigawatts of BESS by the end of next year, secure more than US$4 billion in grant, concessional and commercial finance and, by 2030, unlock 90 gigawatts of BESS to enable 400 gigawatts of renewable energy.
India, in particular, has huge potential for BESS, given its plan to increase renewable-energy capacity to 600 gigawatts (65 percent of total installed capacity) by 2032. To achieve this ambitious goal, distribution companies must be able to procure and accommodate large volumes of renewables in a sustainable manner. At the distribution end, BESS can provide grid balancing, ramping support and other critical services to reduce the total cost of power procurement.
In New Delhi, a 40-megawatt-hours BESS project aims to build a scalable pathway for 1 gigawatt of storage by 2026, creating 10,000 jobs. The pilot project, when scaled up, could advance the technology and encourage more widespread renewable use. This would enhance the stability and dependability of the power grid, allowing for greater integration of clean-energy sources. Eventually, the project could cut carbon dioxide emissions and ensure a cost-effective and reliable supply of renewables.
These technologies have immense potential to promote economic diversification, strengthen energy security and foster job opportunities. Collaborating to advance them and establish a global landscape where sustainable energy underpins prosperity was the focus of last week’s Energy Transition Dialogues in India.
The race to make renewables affordable offers an unparalleled opportunity to generate sustainable and inclusive growth while reducing carbon emissions. However, we can get there only if the private sector, governments and civil society act together to lower the price of — and increase access to — clean tech.
Ravi Venkatesan is chairman of the Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS