Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Tuesday last week made a controversial remark, saying that he does not waste food at meals. His remark caused a stir on social media.
This is classic Ko, making a gaffe and not owning up to the mistake.
Pundits have commented on the definition of food waste, given deep analyses of people with a propensity for misspeaking and delved into food waste policy.
However, what is remarkable and disturbing is that Ko seems to be able to keep on making off-the-cuff remarks while not losing any support.
At a rally on July 16, a woman held a sign with a list of Ko’s sexist and misogynistic comments in silent protest, but was trolled and abused online, while Ko denied the accusations with the nonchalant comment: “What has that got to do with me?”
At the end of the month, the TPP’s English-language slogan “vote white, vote right” was attacked for having racist connotations.
The TPP hit back, saying that candidates surnamed White in the US would also use “vote White” as a slogan.
In August, to establish a female supporters’ group in Taipei, dancers in flight attendant outfits — dubbed “the stewardess support team” by organizers — performed at a campaign event. After the Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union accused the TPP of “sexualizing and objectifying female flight attendants” with the dance routine, Ko’s supporters hit back, saying that porn also objectifies women, but no one is making a fuss.
In September, Ko wrote in the preface of his comic book autobiography Keep Promise (漫畫柯文哲), that in Taiwan, comics are for children, and that they are rarely used as a means to discuss serious issues. Ko’s office has said that the book triggered debate because it was “misunderstood.”
Last month was uneventful, with Ko not making a single verbal blunder, but this month the same Ko that people know well returned to form.
Still, his supporters continued speaking up for him, saying that inedible things cannot be called “food waste.”
Ko’s slip-ups are almost a daily occurence, but it is disturbing that the gaffes, which at times touch upon gender and race, have not made a difference to his campaign.
Opinion polls in July did not give the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) any incentive to propose an alliance with the TPP, but it was begging at the door last month.
Despite his blunders, Ko is still considered a worthy opponent, enough to sit at the table with the more-than-century-old party.
Nonetheless, there is a pattern: Ko makes a gaffe; an uproar ensues; Ko denies the gaffe; his supporters speak up for him; and the controversy fizzles out without so much as a single apology.
Aside from the “vote white, vote right” slogan that the party pulled from its Web site for fear of offending the US, the TPP has never done any soul-searching, as it never suffers from Ko’s gaffes.
The more blunders Ko makes, the more popular he becomes.
The KMT is responsible to a degree for creating this situation. Even though the KMT has an open-minded faction that supports gender equality, it has never openly condemned Ko’s sexism and misogyny.
Indulgence has given birth to the haughty, egotistical opponent that the KMT has no choice but to bend its knee to today.
Nonetheless, a fair share of the responsibility falls on people who give him mindless support. Whenever politicians make a sexist remark, they should be condemned and compelled to apologize regardless of their political affiliation. If a person who makes a gaffe is not held to account by others on their team, it gives birth to a self-centered egotistical maniac like Ko.
Chang Yueh-han is an adjunct assistant professor at Shih Hsin University’s Department of Journalism.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS