As a busy young mother of four living in a remote village in Ethiopia, Amina could not always attend her appointments at the health clinic to receive her injectable contraceptive. So, when Selam, a health worker at the clinic, walked her through the available options, Amina was excited to learn about a long-acting reversible implant that would obviate the need for regular visits.
Selam noticed that more women were choosing long-acting implants for similar reasons. Yet with her clinic experiencing an implant shortage, she worried about running out of the family-planning methods which patients like Amina relied upon. Unfortunately, the situation at Selam’s clinic is not unique: Health centers across the country are contending with supply problems.
More Ethiopian women are using family-planning services than ever before: The country’s prevalence rate jumped from 8 percent in 2000 to 41 percent in 2019. Our government has increased funding for family planning and focused on expanding access at the community level, employing 42,000 health workers across 18,000 posts, all of which has helped us achieve remarkable progress.
Illustration: Yusha
Our contraceptive supply, though, has not kept pace with this ever-growing demand. Ethiopia’s Ministry of Health, which provides women like Amina with a range of free contraceptive choices, faces a country-wide shortage with a large financing gap for family-planning products.
Ethiopia is not alone. Last year, there was a funding shortfall of more than US$100 million for contraceptives in low and middle-income countries — a gap that might leave hundreds of millions of women and girls without access to family-planning methods. This inevitably means more unplanned pregnancies, unsafe abortions and maternal deaths.
Moreover, the barriers to closing this financing gap are formidable. In Ethiopia and around the world, governments must reconcile an ever-growing list of needs with the reality of limited budgets. Women’s and girls’ health, and particularly family planning, is too often — and too readily — put on the back burner during challenging times, despite the dire consequences of going without contraceptives.
While I am deeply familiar with the difficult tradeoffs that policymakers must make, I have also seen the immense benefits that accrue when governments remain committed to family planning. For example, studies have shown that every dollar invested in family planning produces more than US$8 in socioeconomic returns. That is because reducing the rate of unplanned pregnancies results in more mothers and babies surviving childbirth, more girls and women attending school and working outside the home, and stronger and healthier families. Access to contraceptives unlocks a cycle of empowerment that generates economic growth and prosperity for all.
That is why we are embracing innovative health-financing strategies in Ethiopia to stretch our resources. The goal is to close the financing gap in the short term and to increase country ownership, thus decreasing reliance on donors in the long term.
To this end, Ethiopia’s Ministry of Health and Ministry of Finance signed a country compact with the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) to increase domestic financing for family planning in a gradual, sustainable way that leverages early support from donors.
A second, complementary financing structure is now enabling us to increase funding for family-planning products through a partnership compact signed between the Ethiopian government, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, USAID Ethiopia and the Netherlands. Over three years, the Ethiopian government is set to triple its contraceptive funding and contribute a total of US$11.1 million to fund contraceptive supplies, which is to be matched by these donors. This is the largest investment in family planning that Ethiopia has made in 20 years, and the collective funding would fill nearly 70 percent of the estimated funding shortfall for contraceptives.
Notably, these agreements were reached while Ethiopia was facing conflict, climate-related droughts and floods and disease outbreaks, because we recognize that the importance of family planning is even more acute in times of hardship. Our success is a testament to the power of collaboration, but also demonstrates that increased investment in family planning is possible, even under economically challenging conditions.
Of course, an adequate supply of contraceptives is only one piece of the puzzle. To improve family-planning coverage, we must continue to expand our outreach, strengthen our health system, and empower women and girls in Ethiopia to get the care they need.
Yet working to close the funding gap for contraceptives is a crucial first step. Importantly, progress could be made when government agencies work together — as Ethiopia’s health and finance ministries did — and engage effectively with donors. Together, we could achieve what none of us could do alone, while moving closer to our shared goal of country-led public health.
Lia Tadesse is Ethiopia’s minister of health.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means