As soon as the COVID-19 pandemic started to ease, air travel resumed. From January to last month, Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport recorded 28.24 million passengers, with the number of travelers reaching 69.5 percent of pre-pandemic levels.
In Asia, the commercial aircraft market size has also recovered, with Taiwanese companies having acquired new aircraft to meet the demand. The number of transit passengers is increasing and the government has offered measures to assist foreigners visiting Taiwan.
By the end of this year, the number of total passengers could reach 35 million and growth is set to continue. In 2026, passenger volume is projected to reach 54 million, which is 5 million more than the pre-pandemic level. To meet the demand, the airport must expand its space and service capacity.
First, even before the pandemic, more than 12 million travelers relied on the airport’s Terminals 1 and 2. Although these terminals went through reconstruction and expansion, the work is far from sufficient. The facilities that require more space, such as passport control areas and security checks, should be improved. The Arrival Hall at Terminal 2 has also not been upgraded. Travelers returning to or entering Taiwan still spend too much time waiting for clearance.
Second, today, more flights arrive at peak hours, with ever more transit passengers coming in. The baggage handling area in the basement is far from adequate. Passengers have to spend a long time waiting for their luggage. The operation area for handling baggage and the area’s circulation must be improved.
Third, the space for transit flights should be increased, and so should the service capacity for transit passengers. Nowadays, no security checks are required for transit passengers entering Taiwan directly from the US. This has mitigated the situation and enabled the airport to be less packed in the morning. However, the government might have to tighten security due to the situation in the Middle East. The airport must make adjustments as soon as possible.
Also, in recent years, the importance of border control cannot be over-emphasized. To prevent diseases and pests from entering Taiwan, inspection at the airport should be thoroughly carried out. Since the early stages of the spread of African swine fever, the Customs Administration has tightened border control measures. The inspection is done in a limited space in the immigration corridors. At busier times, this limited space would be even more congested — not a pleasant scene for the country’s gateway. Exclusive areas should be arranged for implementing border control, just like many other international airports.
Lastly, to accommodate the growing number of passengers, more workers should be hired by airline companies and airport agencies. Today, there is a shortage of accommodation facilities, work spaces, rest areas and parking spaces. Given that flights arriving and departing in the early morning or late at night are increasing, many employees commute by car. Reports from before the pandemic have already said that the airport should provide more parking spaces.
Thus, Terminal 1’s Departure Hall car parking lot and Terminal 2’s bus parking lot should be rebuilt with steel structures to create more space. Check-in counters and clearance facilities could be added so that passengers without checked bags, or who have already checked in, could enter and exit.
After the Terminal 2 bus parking lot is renovated, the parking lot for airport workers could be relocated to the upper floors. In doing so, more spaces would become available.
Wayne Chou is a former director of Chiang Kai-shek International Airport.
Translated by Emma Liu
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission