Despite months without a positive response from Beijing, the government on Friday last week announced that it would go ahead with a plan to reopen to Chinese tour groups and allow Taiwanese tours to travel to China by March 1 next year at the latest.
The decision was criticized as a reversal from its statement last month, when Minister of Transportation and Communications Wang Kwo-tsai (王國材) said cross-strait tourism would be put on hold for the time being and re-evaluated in the new year, as Beijing had failed to reciprocate its overtures.
Group tourism across the Taiwan Strait has been halted for three years since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, although even before then China had banned individual tourists from traveling to Taiwan.
Attempts to restart cross-strait tourism have proceeded in fits and starts this year, stymied by sensitive politics while the rest of the world left pandemic restrictions far in the rear view. On May 19, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) announced that Chinese travel agencies could immediately resume receiving group tours from Taiwan, catching Taipei off-guard. As the decision was made unilaterally, the then-Tourism Bureau (now the Tourism Administration) declined to reciprocate, saying that regulations should be discussed bilaterally through existing channels, even while it welcomed the decision in principle.
Then in August, the Mainland Affairs Council extended an olive branch by opening Taiwan to Chinese tourists living abroad, or in Hong Kong or Macau, and to Chinese on short-term business visas. It also announced that it planned to reopen to tour groups, pending a one-month “preparation period,” during which it would wait for Beijing’s response.
The TAO issued a fierce response, accusing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government of attempting to erect more barriers to cross-strait travel by proposing an initial cap of 2,000 people per day traveling in each direction, to be lifted later on. Taipei’s mild suggestion clearly did not merit such an intense response, laying bare China’s political machinations.
With January’s pivotal elections approaching, it was never likely that Beijing was going to play nice with the DPP administration. A key part of its “united front” strategy — especially ahead of elections — is to paint the DPP as bad for cross-strait relations by refusing to work with the party at any juncture and arbitrarily throwing up more barriers.
Tourism is a useful cudgel, which it used in 2019 before the 2020 presidential and legislative elections. By banning individual tourists from traveling to Taiwan, many voters interpreted it as an indictment of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and accused her of mishandling cross-strait relations. Some even came to see the move as Tsai’s decision, rather than stemming from Beijing.
With the government’s latest announcement that it is to move ahead with reopening cross-strait group travel, regardless of Beijing’s response, the DPP administration is making a concerted effort to break the stand-off across the Strait. It is also the right move if it aims to thwart Chinese election interference.
Many Taiwanese already view the DPP as being bad for cross-strait affairs, and its insistence on respectful reciprocation from Beijing was beginning to look petty to voters. The government was of course justified in demanding respect, as the truly petty actor in this exchange has been Beijing, which acted unilaterally and then resorted to name-calling and petulant silence when it did not get its way. However, by showing magnanimity in the face of Beijing’s acrimony for the sake of the nation’s tour operators and hospitality industry, which have been clamoring for a reopening, it makes clear to voters that the DPP is reasonable regarding cross-strait affairs — it is Beijing that plays with cross-strait policy when it is politically beneficial to do so.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS