‘Energy stick’ a health risk
A toy called a “carrot knife” was popular among students in China, and has become a trend in Taiwan. Now, it is reported that “energy sticks” have also become popular in elementary schools in China. This new product is a nasal inhaler stick composed of mint and camphor.
Stores that sell these energy sticks claim that they cause no harm, but even so, it is inappropriate to put such sticks into noses. Such behavior might cause nose infections and damage the nasal mucosa and olfactory nerve.
Even though the energy sticks are not toxic as claimed by the manufacturers and vendors, students could become addicted to them after using them. Some students said that they cannot live without the product.
It should also be mentioned that not every child can inhale mint or camphor. If the energy sticks eventually damage the health of these children, it is too much of a price to pay. Worse, some people might exploit the energy stick and insert poison or drugs into it.
Through the Internet, the distance between Taiwan and China has been shortened. It is likely that the energy sticks will make their way into Taiwan’s schools soon. To protect Taiwanese children’s physical and mental health, precautions should be taken as soon as possible.
The government should pay more attention to this new toy. The energy stick might be more dangerous than the carrot knife, which would sooner or later become less popular.
However, the energy stick could lead to addiction. For elementary-school students, any kind of addiction would have severe consequences. Taiwan must prevent this from happening and nip it in the bud.
Hsu Chia-hsin
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS