Hours after the Israel-Hamas conflict erupted on Oct. 7, Bharat Nayak, a fact-checker in the east Indian state of Jharkhand, noticed a surge of disinformation and hate speech directed at Muslims on his dashboard of WhatsApp messages.
The viral messages from hundreds of public WhatsApp groups in India contained graphic images and videos, including many from Syria and Afghanistan falsely labeled as being from Israel, with captions in Hindi that called Muslims evil.
“They are using the crisis to spread misinformation against Muslims, saying they will attack Hindus in a similar way, and to falsely accuse opposition parties and others of supporting Hamas, and calling for their elimination,” Nayak said. “The content is very graphic, the messaging is extreme, and it gets forwarded many times, as there is no content moderation on WhatsApp.”
The conflict, which has killed more than 1,400 people in Israel and more than 8,000 in the Gaza Strip, has triggered a surge in disinformation and hate speech against Muslims and Jews across social media platforms from India to China to the US.
Meta and X, formerly known as Twitter, said they have removed tens of thousands of posts, but the volume of disinformation and hate speech underlines the failure of social media platforms to boost content moderation, particularly in languages other than English, digital rights experts say.
“We’ve tirelessly drawn their attention to these issues over the years, but social media platforms continue to fall short when it comes to combating hate speech, incitement and disinformation,” said Mona Shtaya, a nonresident fellow at the non-profit Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy.
“The recent layoffs in trust and safety teams across platforms underscore this deficiency,” she said. “Additionally, their resource allocation — based on market size, rather than assessed risks — exacerbates the challenges faced by marginalized communities including Palestinians and others.”
In a blog post, Meta — which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp — wrote that it had “quickly established a special operations center staffed with experts, including fluent Hebrew and Arabic speakers,” and that it is working with third-party fact-checkers in the region “to debunk false claims.”
X did not respond to a request for comment.
Failures of content moderation are not limited to the decades-long Israel-Palestine conflict.
UN human rights investigators said in 2018 that the use of Facebook had played a key role in spreading hate speech that fueled violence against the ethnic Rohingya community in Myanmar in 2017.
Rohingya refugees in 2021 sued Meta for US$150 billion over allegations that the company’s failures to police content, and its platform’s design contributed to the real-world violence.
Meta has acknowledged being “too slow” to act in Myanmar.
Last year, a lawsuit against Meta filed in Kenya accused the platform of allowing violent and hateful posts from Ethiopia on Facebook, and its recommendation systems of amplifying violent posts that inflamed the Ethiopian civil war.
The company has faced similar accusations related to violence in Sri Lanka, India, Indonesia and Cambodia.
The surge in disinformation during the Israel-Hamas conflict underscores that “platforms do not have the right systems in place,” said Sabhanaz Rashid Diya, a former head of policy at Meta for Bangladesh and founding board director of the Tech Global Institute think tank.
Diya said that “the historical under-investment in specific parts of the world and specific languages is now being tested in this crisis.”
“Some of the challenges we’re seeing around the information ecosystem are consequences of not building capacity; these are consequences of automated systems, staffing issues; not having sufficient fact-checkers in these markets; not having policies that are contextualized for local regions,” Diya said.
The Arab Center for Social Media Advancement, or 7amleh, has documented more than 500,000 instances in Hebrew of hate speech and incitement to violence against Palestinians and their supporters.
There is also a more than 50-fold increase in the absolute volume of anti-Semitic comments on YouTube videos, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue in London said in a report this week.
State-affiliated accounts of Iran, Russia and China are also spreading disinformation and hate speech on Facebook and X, it said, adding that it could contribute to “popularization and deepening mistrust towards democratic institutions and the media.”
Reports of anti-Semitic and Islamophobic incidents have surged worldwide, including assaults, vandalism and the fatal stabbing of a six-year-old Palestinian boy in the US.
They are a result of the hate speech online, said Marc Owen Jones, an associate professor who researches disinformation in the Middle East at Hamad bin Khalifa University in Qatar.
“Much of the disinformation is violent, graphic and highly emotive — designed to provoke polarization and turn people against each other,” Jones said.
It is “driving a sense of righteousness and tribalism that contributes to violence, as we’ve seen as far away as Dagestan and Illinois. The upshot is dire,” Jones said.
Yet despite heated conversations around the need for better content moderation, trust and safety is “resource-intensive, meaning that tackling the issue is a challenge for any platform,” said Yu-lan Scholliers, head of product at Checkstep, a UK-based content moderation services firm.
With easy access to artificial intelligence, “it’s now much easier to generate real-looking but fake content — requiring more advanced detection mechanisms,” said Scholliers, who previously worked in Meta’s product data science team.
However, even if platforms invest heavily in their trust and safety teams, the main challenge “is and will be adversarial behavior — users always find more and more creative ways to avoid detection,” she said. “It is a whack-a-mole that can never be fully solved.”
With additional reporting by Avi Asher-Schapiro
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s