Former Chinese premier Li Keqiang’s (李克強) sudden passing last week at the age of 68 dropped a bombshell on China. Many consider his death to be a rare oppertunity to air pent-up discontent with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the direction in which he has taken the country, while tributes have flooded the country’s tightly controlled Internet.
While Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) was in the US, he refrained from touching upon Li’s passing, and held off on confirming Xi’s attendance at the APEC forum.
With Taiwan entering the final stages of campaigning for January’s elections and talks of a “blue-white alliance” between the candidates of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) under way, as well as Chinese authorities searching the offices of Hon Hai Precision Industry — apparently as a warning to company founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who is running as an independent — and interfering in the democratic process in other ways, it remains to be seen how Xi intends to snuff out potential social movements triggered by the public’s reaction to Li’s death and take precautionary measures to prevent social gatherings that could lead to another Tiananmen Square Massacre.
US-China ties are at a tipping point. As the two do not see eye to eye on the Israel-Hamas war — with China condemning the violence against civilians in Gaza, but not denouncing Hamas by name — the US has been focusing on patching up the relationship while avoiding the subject of the conflict. Perhaps this is why US President Joe Biden has refrained from asking China to declare its position on the conflict, but has been concerned about whether Xi would participate in the APEC forum.
After Biden met with Wang, the White House released a statement saying: “President Biden expressed his condolences on the passing of former premier Li Keqiang.”
However, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs mysteriously removed any mention of Li, leaving only “Biden sends his regards to Xi.”
At such a critical moment, the ministry’s official statement was carefully crafted to toe the line of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The omission of Li is enough to show that Chinese authorities are going out of their way to downplay his passing, especially by keeping China’s people in the dark about the reaction in Western countries, to prevent further “incidents.”
With Xi securing a third five-year term as president, he still sees US-China relations as one of his top priorities, as decoupling from the US works against China. Consequently, it has to keep its options open by entertaining the US with the possibility of Xi attending the APEC forum. Otherwise, a US that sees no hope of turning the tide could ratchet up sanctions. Only by keeping the US’ hopes up would there be space for negotiation, which falls in line with Chinese interests.
Nonetheless, Li’s death might have reminded Washington of Xi’s authoritarian and ideologically driven regime, and could sabotage the relationship, which is why China is on tenterhooks over his passing.
Li’s sudden death has triggered different responses in Taiwan’s political camps. As China has not released any details regarding his death, except a “doctors did their best” statement, it has had a hard time convincing Taiwanese that his death was not suspicious, increasing skepticism and speculation.
With former Chinese minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang (秦剛) and former Chinese minister of national defense Li Shangfu (李尚福) having been removed, people have ample reason to believe that Xi is “cleaning house,” with those who are lucky stepping down and those less fortunate losing their lives.
Is the CCP backing the KMT-TPP alliance — including with the probe of Hon Hai’s tax situation? Would it retaliate if the alliance does not come to fruition? Or would it stick to its mudslinging against the Democratic Progressive Party?
The danger that a potential KMT-TPP union poses, especially if the CCP is behind it, must be kept in mind.
Moreover, the political upheaval in China might lead to Beijing incorrectly assessing the international order or initiating armed conflict to divert the attention of ordinary Chinese and distract from grief over Li.
China has censored references to his death and praise of him on social media, while universities have banned mourning activities.
However, people are placing flowers in his honor and skirting the Internet censors, including with snide comments about Xi, indicating the level of discontent.
It remains to be seen how much pressure Li’s death might bring upon Chinese society. What Taiwanese need to bear in mind is that they alone have the obligation to safeguard their homeland and not place their hopes on outside assistance. They certainly should not believe the lies spawned by Chinese election interference efforts.
As the relationships between Taiwan, the US and China become more intertwined, people should not underestimate the tremendous impact that Li’s death could have upon the global community.
Chiu Chih-wei is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Rita Wang
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS